Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

as

of which it treats, by his love of metaphysics, and the profound and original speculations which it contained; inviting to the young and free inquirer as they were alarming to the heads of the university. It was not till some years after this that the immortal author of the work in question became known to his young disciple, and that that enduring friendship was cemented betwixt them, which both of them have taken pains to record-" a friendship on both sides founded on the admiration of genius and the love of simplicity," as Mr. Stewart has beautifully expressed it, and which, without biassing the judgment of Smith, must have exalted the pride and the pleasure which he felt, when years after this, he cited him in the" Wealth of Nations" in language which many have thought savoured rather of the warmth of friendship than the calmness of sober judgment, as by far the most illustrious philosopher and historian of the present age*

When Smith was sent to Oxford, it had been the intention of his family that he should study for the Church of England. He remained seven years at that renowned seat of learning; but long before he left it, not finding the ecclesiastical profession suited to his taste, he had abandoned all such intention, and preferred the hopes of such small emolument as his literary attainments might procure for him in his own country, to the higher prospects which the prudence of his friends had pointed out. As there is every reason to admire the independence of mind which induced him to abandon those prospects, we can have none to regret it on any other ground, from the direction which was thus given to the studies and the labours of his future life. There is no doubt that had Dr. Smith voluntarily made the Church his profession, he would have adorned it by genius and learning, that the purity of his life would have added force to the precepts which it would have been his duty to inculcate as a Christian teacher. But this advantage would have been too dearly purchased. The Church would more easily find a substitute for Smith as one of its ministers, than the world might have found one like him, capable of unfolding for its instruction those laws equally divine in their origin and beneficent in their results when rightly apprehended, which regulate

Book v. Ch. 1.

the order and advance the moral and political condition of society. The mind of Smith, which found in such subjects a boundless field for his contemplations, might have been confined, and at length contracted, by the professional study of theological learning. The great truths of religion are as simple as they are sublime; and their simplicity renders useless much that human ingenuity can do, while their sublimity defies it. To know God, says Seneca, is to worship him. And much of this knowledge is attained by looking attentively upon the glories of his creation.

[ocr errors]

It is to be lamented that we know so little of the life of Smith during that part of it which was passed at Oxford. What he thought of that university, of its discipline and its studies, he told the world many years after in a memorable passage of the "Wealth of Nations*, which has never been forgiven by the worshippers of Oxford, and by all those who are prone to consider it a crime to point out the defects of any ancient institution. Strange it may seem that there should always be a number of persons prone to such a course, seeing that the corruptions and abuses which are incident to establishments of this kind, like the diseases in the animal body, have a natural tendency to bring on decay, and that the best friend to such institutions, like the best physician, is he who first discovers the disorder-a discovery necessarily antecedent to the suggestion of the remedy. Yet there are few mistakes so common as this in the world, and few more fatal to its improvement. It is the error of preferring the means to the end, the mere instrument, an instrument often worn out, and sometimes become useless, to the excellent purposes it was designed to work. It may be proper to enlarge a little upon this topic, on account of the unjust prejudice that has been excited against Dr. Smith, in consequence of his animadversions upon Oxford, and is constantly excited for the worst purposes against men like him, whose enlightened and benevolent efforts for the improvement of public institutions, instead of gratitude, have often experienced calumny and opposition. If Smith censured the discipline, or rather the want of discipline, and the abandonment of duty in the tutors and professors of Oxford in his day, what possible motive

*Book v. Ch. 1. Part 3.

could he have that is reconcileable with the acknowledged qualities of the man, but a zeal, a warm and indignant zeal, it may be, in behalf of that learning and science which was going to ruin, by the neglect of those who were appointed for their conservation? Of course it is unnecessary to say that we refer not to Oxford as it now is; but if it has been reformed since the days of Smith, it has been reformed only, because some have been found bold and wise enough, like him and after him, to proclaim that it stood in need of such reformation. Far be it from us, and from every friend of learning, to abate that just veneration for the institutions of our country; those especially which have the promotion of science and of virtue for their object, which is really their due-due often to their antiquity to the excellence of their founders and to the long catalogue of illustrious men who have been bred under them, and whose wisdom and learning, whose virtue and heroism in after life, seem, by a very natural and pleasing illusion, to become identified with the places in which they were educated.

Of the seven years which Smith passed at Oxford little, indeed, has been recorded. We have scarcely an incident relating to his private life, and as little do we know respecting his intellectual habits. Mr. Stewart presumes that he cultivated with particular care, at this time, the study of languages;-a study for which it would seem he had an unusual fondness, and in which, at all events, he is known to have excelled. But Smith studied languages more as a philosopher than a scholar, as they serve to throw light on the manners, the institutions, the modes of thought peculiar to different nations and ages. His knowledge of Greek was profound and accurate; and his taste and high admiration for the drama and literature of the Greeks, preserved to the latest period of his life, may be best traced to the studies and the society in which he mixed whilst at the university. Mr. Dalzell, the distinguished professor of Greek in the University of Edinburgh, has borne testimony to the extent and accuracy of Dr. Smith's acquaintance with that noble language, as often displayed in conversation with him on some of the nicest minutiæ of grammatical criticism. He was accustomed at this time to exercise himself in translation

from various languages, chiefly French; and always spoke of it as useful for the acquisition of the art of composition, and for improvement in style. Gibbon has recommended the same practice in his own Memoirs, and a mode of study, we may venture to say, which was pursued and praised by two such distinguished writers, is well worth the attention of all who cultivate literature.

Upon quitting Oxford, Smith returned to Kirkaldy, where he continued to reside with his mother for two years, with the most ardent application to study. In 1748 he removed to Edinburgh, and there commenced his connexion and friendship with many of the distinguished men who then adorned that city; and. composed a society which included within its range an extent and variety of accomplishments, and a depth and solidity of philosophy and of learning, not easily equalled in any other, at any period of modern Europe. Among its members we find a vast portion of the names familiar to us, from having enriched the literature of our country in various departments, about the middle of the last century. Those of Hume and Robertson, of Blair, of Ferguson, of Lord Kames and John Home, are known to every reader; but there were others not less accomplished though less known to posterity, whose genius and talents added lustre, even to so brilliant an assemblage of men; Lord Elibank, Sir Gilbert Elliot, Lord Loughborough, Sir William Pulteney, Lord Monboddo, Dr. Logan; these, and many others, we find enumerated in the Select Society," which was formed in Edinburgh about that period; the list of which Mr. Stewart has preserved*. At this time commenced his memorable friendship with David Hume, the philosopher who had led the way into those very regions of moral and political inquiry, where Smith was destined to follow, guided chiefly, as he always confessed, and as was admitted by his admirers, by that light which had been shed upon them by the most subtle intellect, perhaps, which ancient or modern Europe has produced r.

66

It was not long after his settlement in Edinburgh, that the friendly patronage of Lord Kames induced Smith to com

* Appendix to the Life of Robertson.

+ It is hardly necessary to remind the reader that, in the panegyrics pronounced upon Hume, we refer merely to his celebrated writings upon moral and political science, and not to those upon religion.

mence a course of Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, which he continued for a considerable time; until the high reputation which he had earned, seconded by the zeal of his friends, procured for him, in 1751, the professorship of Logic in the university of Glasgow. In 1752, upon the death of Mr. Thomas Craigie, he was advanced to the chair of Moral Philosophy in the same University; an office which he continued to fill for thirteen years;-a period which he was accustomed to look back upon, as the most useful and happy of his life. "It was indeed a situation," says his biographer, "in which he was eminently fitted to excel, and in which the daily labours of his profession were constantly recalling his attention to his favourite pursuits, and familiarising his mind to those important speculations he was afterwards to communicate to the world."

It is greatly to be regretted, that no part of his lectures whilst at Glasgow, has been preserved; but the following brief and very interesting account of them was furnished by one of Dr. Smith's pupils, who afterward became one of his warmest and latest friends. There is no necessity to apologise for presenting it to our readers, seeing that we cannot better supply the vacuum that would otherwise be left, owing to the very scanty materials which remain for a life of this distinguished man. "In the professorship of logic," says one of his students, "to which Dr. Smith was appointed on his first introduction to this university, he soon saw the necessity of departing widely from the plan that had been followed by his predecessors; and of directing the attention of his pupils to studies of a more interesting and useful nature than the logic and metaphysics of the schools. Accordingly after exhibiting a general view of the powers of the mind, and explaining so much of the ancient logic as was requisite to gratify curiosity, with respect to an artificial method of reasoning, which had once occupied the universal attention of the learned, he dedicated the rest of his time to the delivery of a system of Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. The best method of explaining and illustrating the various powers of the human mind, the most useful part of metaphysics, arises from an examination of the several ways of communicating our thoughts by speech, and from an attention to the principles of those literary composi

on'

tions, which contribute to persuasion or entertainment. The first part of these lectures, in point of composition, was highly finished; and the whole discovered strong marks of taste and original genius. His course of lectures moral philosophy was divided into four parts. The first contained natural theology, in which he considered the proofs of the being and attributes of God, and those principles of the human mind on which religion is founded. The second comprehended ethics strictly so called; in the third part, he treated at more length of that branch of morality which relates to justice. Upon this subject he endeavoured to trace the gradual progress of jurisprudence, both public and private, from the rudest to the most refined ages, and to point out the effects of those arts, which contribute to subsistence, and to the accumulation of property, in producing corresponding improvements in law and government. In the last part of his lectures, he examined those political regulations, founded not upon the principle of justice, but of expediency, and which are calculated to increase the riches, the power, and the prosperity of a state: under this view he considered the political institutions relating to commerce, to finances to ecclesiastical and military establishments. In delivering his lectures, he trusted almost entirely to extemporary elocution. His manner was plain and unaffected, and as he seemed to be always interested in his subject, he never failed to interest his hearers. Each discourse consisted of several distinct propositions, which he endeavoured to prove and illustrate. In his attempts to explain them, he often appeared at first not to be sufficiently possessed of the subject, and spoke with some hesitation: as he advanced, the matter seemed to crowd upon him, his manner became warm and animated, and his expression easy and fluent. In points of controversy, it was discernible that he conceived an opposition to be made to his opinions, and that he was led to support them with greater energy and vehemence. By the fulness and variety of his illustrations the subject swelled in his hands, and acquired a dimension, which, without a repetition of the same views, was calculated to seize the attention of his audience, and to afford them pleasure and instruction in following the same object through all the diversity

of shades and aspects in which it was presented, and afterwards in tracing it backwards to that original proposition or general truth from which this beautiful train of speculation had proceeded, His reputation as a professor was raised very high; and a multitude of students from a great distance resorted to the University merely upon his account. Those branches of science which he taught became fashionable at this place, and his opinions were the chief topics of discussion in clubs and literary societies. Even the peculiarities in his pronunciation, or manner of speaking, became frequently the objects of imitation."

66

[ocr errors]

In the year 1755, a few of the eminent men then at the head of literature in Scotland had established a journal (under the title of the "Edinburgh Review; a title rendered familiar to the readers of the present day by the celebrity of the literary periodical journal under that name, which was established in the same city about half a century later. All that we learn of the plan and object of this design must be gathered from the only two numbers which were published of it. Smith, as is now well known, was a contributor, and, amongst other papers, was the author of the "Review of Dr. Johnson's Dictionary," then recently published, and of a very interesting letter addressed to the Editor, on the state of literature on the Continent, especially that of France. To the curious in literary relics, even these papers will be valuable, as appertaining to so celebrated a man, and the first of the productions of his genius which were committed to the public. In other respects it is perhaps unnecessary to say, that they can add nothing to the fame of the writer. Dr. Robertson was also a contributor; Mr. Hume was not; and we are indebted to Mr. Mackenzie for an amusing anecdote accounting for the omission. Such, we are told, was the extreme artlessness of his character, that his friends feared from it the discovery of their secret; as they also feared that their criticisms would be disarmed of all their force, from the extreme gentleness of his nature, which could not tolerate even the exercise of literary warfare. The Review immediately on its appearance had attracted, as might have been expected, considerable notice; and Mr. Hume was often expressing his astonishment amongst his friends, that a production of

so much talent should be going forward in the city in which he lived, and that he, connected as he was with every literary character of any distinction in it, should know nothing of its authors, It was determined at length that the secret should be communicated to him on a certain day, which was to be agreed upon, provided he would swear to preserve it. The day was fixed,-it was at a dinner where they were all expected to meet; the Review was mentioned ;Hume expressed, as he had done before, his surprise and curiosity on the subject, when he was told by one of the company, that provided he would take his oath not to divulge it, the secret should be communicated to him. "But how is the oath to be administered," said David, with his usual pleasantry, "to a man accused of so much scepticism as I am? you would not take my Bible oath, but I will swear by the To zaλov, and the To To*, never to reveal your secret." Unfortunately, either from want of perseverance in those connected with it, or of encouragement in the public to any undertaking of the kind, the Review was shortly after abandoned, and the distinguished partisan whom they had thus enlisted, had no opportunity of rendering his service in its support.

The Select Society, which we have before mentioned, was another association of which Smith was a member; formed for the purpose of philosophical inquiry, and the cultivation of the art of public speaking. It met for the first time in the Advocates' Library in May 1754, and ever after during the sitting of the Court of Session, every Friday evening. The most distinguished in the Society as speakers were Sir Gilbert Elliot, Lord Elibank, and Dr. Robert

son.

"David Hume and Adam Smith," says the memorial, "never opened their lips;" an intimation which may occasion some surprise, when it is considered that the two men thus remarked for being mute, were, unquestionably, the most original and profound thinkers in the whole of that gifted assemblage, as well as the most elegant, and (in Mr. Hume's case) the most fluent of writers, and possessing withal ample extent and variety of learning and knowledge. But however able and distinguished in the chair of moral philosophy at Glasgow, and whatever talents he was known to possess in the circle of his friends, it

The beautiful and the fitting.

was not until the year 1759 that Dr. Smith gave evidence to the world of those talents, and laid the foundation of his fame, by the publicacation of his first great work, the "Theory of Moral Sentiments," in which he may be supposed to embody the result of a part of his professional labours in the University upon one of the most interesting problems in the whole range of philosophical inquiry.

There are few things more pleasing with respect to a character or a composition of established genius, when we contemplate them at a distance, than to ascertain what were the opinions entertained of them by their contemporaries. Fortunately we possess the most satisfactory and delightful of all evidence upon this subject concerning the work before us; but before we enter upon any remarks on this beautiful production, we shall present our readers with a letter from Mr. Hume, addressed to Dr. Smith, immediately after its publication. It would be an injury to withhold this effusion of friendship, which possesses the highest claim upon our attention, from its connexion with one of the most important epochs in the life of the eminent person of whom we are writing. Mr. Hume happened to be in London during the publication of the "Theory of Moral Sentiments," mixing in society most distinguished for rank, taste, and learning, and always anxious, with the generosity and affection which characterized him, to extend the fame and glory of his friend. If the work had been lost to the world, and we had possessed no other evidence of its merits, and of the admiration excited by its appearance, we might form a tolerable estimate of both from the contents of the following letter ::

[ocr errors][merged small]

"MY DEAR SMITH,

"I give you thanks for the agreeable present of your 'Theory.' Wedderburn and I made presents of our copies to such of our acquaintances as we thought good judges and proper to spread the reputation of the book. I sent one to the Duke of Argyle, to Lord Lyttleton, Horace Walpole, Soame Jennyns, and Burke, an Irish gentleman who lately wrote a very pretty treatise on the Sublime. Millar desired my permission to send one in your name to Dr. Warburton. I have delayed writing to you, till I could tell you something of

the success of the book, and could prognosticate with some probability, whether it should be finally damned to oblivion, or be registered in the temple of immortality. Though it has been published only a few weeks, I think there appear already such strong symptoms that I can almost venture to foretel its fate. In short, it is this- But I have been interrupted by a foolish impertinent visit of one who has lately come from Scotland. He tells me that the University of Glasgow intend to declare Rouet's office vacant upon his going abroad with Lord Hope. I question not but you will have our friend Ferguson in your eye, in case another project for procuring him a place in the University of Edinburgh should fail. Ferguson has very much polished and improved his treatise on 'Refinement,** and with some amendments it will make an admirable book, and discovers an elegant and a singular genius. The Epigoniad' I hope will do, but it will be somewhat up-hill work. As I doubt not but you consult the reviews sometimes, at present, you will see in the Critical Review' a letter upon that poem, and I desire you to employ your conjectures in finding out the author-let me see a sample of your skill in knowing hands by guessing at the person. I am afraid of Lord Kames's

[ocr errors]

-

Law Tracts; a man might as well think of making a fine sauce by a mixture of wormwood and aloes, as an agreeable composition by joining metaphysics and Scotch law. However, the book I believe has merit, though few people will take the pains of diving into it.But to return to your book, and its success in this town, I must tell you A plague of interruptions! I ordered myself to be denied, and yet here is one that has broken in upon me again. He is a man of letters, and we have had a good deal of literary conversation. You told me that you were curious of literary anecdotes; and therefore I shall inform you of a few that have come to my knowledge. I believe I have mentioned to you already Helvetius's book 'De l'Esprit. It is worth your reading, not for its philosophy, which I do not highly value, but for its agreeable compositiont. I had a letter from him a few

*The same which he afterwards published under the title of An Essay on the History of Civil Society."

+ This passage is of itself tolerably conclusive as to the vulgar error of confounding Mr. Hume's philo

sophy with that of the French materialists of the Vide page 10, and note, p. 13.

last century and their English disciples in this.

« AnteriorContinuar »