« AnteriorContinuar »
used for Ireland.' For an engraving of the halfpenny see Works,
James Simon, in his Irish Coins, published in 1749, says (ed. 1810, p. 70) that, on several parcels of these halfpence being sent over at different times, a small number out of each parcel were taken at random and weighed, and divided into four sorts. In the four sorts the halfpenny weighed 120, III, 103, and 96' grs. respectively. He does not say by whom the assay was made, and therefore no trust can be put in it.' Swift tried to discredit the English assay. 'Wood,' he writes,
takes care to coin a dozen or two halfpence of good metal, sends them to the Tower, and they are approved. Works, vi. 356. He did not stick at a lie, however gross. The English halfpence, he says, were of such good metal that a brazier would not lose much more than a penny in a shilling if he beat them to pieces and used them as copper ; whereas Mr. Wood made his halfpence of such base metal, and so much smaller than the English ones, that the brasier would not give you above a penny of good money for a shilling of his. Ib. p. 341.
If Swift's lies can be justified by usage, so can the job. It was an age of jobbery. Wood's job, however, was done in a way to provoke the Irish. 'No project,' wrote the Irish Chancellor Middleton, was ever carried on so sillily as this hath been. The patent was concealed, and made a great secret here.' Coxe's Walpole, ii. 370. Neither the Lord Lieutenant nor his Privy Council was.' formally consulted.' Wood by his threats increased the difficulty. Ib. i. 223. The Irish Houses of Parliament presented addresses against the patent. Ib. ii. 368. 'Is not their Parliament,' asks Swift, ' as fair a representative of the people as that of England ?' Works, vi. 382. Nevertheless he scorned the Parliament. He described the members as 'those wretches here who call themselves a Parliament. . . . They imitate the English Parliament after the same manner as a monkey does a human creature.' Ib. xviii. 283, 308.
Whether he did more good by defeating a dishonest project, or more harm by keeping on the old currency, may be questioned. As at length he comes out of his 'obscurity' we seem to hear him saying :
What though the field be lost?
Paradise Lost, i. 105. We see him with a stern countenance, and aiming a blow at his old adversaries.' SWIFT, 62 n.
APPENDIX H (PAGE 38) The book appeared in Nov. 1726. He had planned it, if not begun it, as early as Jan. I, 1721-2, when Bolingbroke wrote to him 'I long to see your Travels.' Works, xvi. 378. He was finishing it in the autumn of 1725. On Sept. 29 of that year he wrote :— The chief end I propose to myself in all my labours is to vex the world rather * In the text 196. The average given of the four shows that it should be 96.
than divert it. Works, xvii. 4. In November he described himself as
sitting like a toad in a corner of his great house, with a perfect hatred of all public actions and persons.' Ib. p. 17. On Nov. 8, 1726, Arbuthnot wrote to him from London :-Gulliver's Travels, I believe, will have as great a run as John Bunyan.' Ib. p. 70. On Nov. 17 Gay wrote :- The whole impression sold in a week.' Ib. p. 81. On Feb. 14, 1726-7, Swift wrote (Letters to Chetwode, p. 202) 'I hear it hath made a bookseller almost rich enough to be an alderman.' He complained that it hath been mangled in the press.' He had not found 'a printer brave enough to venture his ears' by printing it complete. Works, xvii. 3. For the 'mangling' see Letters to Chetwode, p. 205.
It was the only book (except Temple's Works) by which he got a farthing; and that was by Mr. Pope's prudent management for me.' Ib. p. 204; Works, xviii. 285, xix. 230; Swift, 110 n. He sold the copyright for £200. N. & Q. 1 S. xii. 198. For the early editions see ib. 6 S. xii. 198, 350, 398, 473. Des Fontaines, who translated it into French, wrote to Swift on July 4, 1727, that it had reached its third edition. Works, xvii. 120.
See also ib. i. 320.
APPENDIX I (PAGE 39) In Sept. 1726, on his return to Ireland, he sent Mrs. Howard 'a piece of Irish plaid. ... My real design is that when the Princess asks
you where you got that fine nightgown, you are to say that it is an Irish plaid sent you by the Dean of St. Patrick's; who, with his most humble duty, is ready to make her such another present, if she will descend to honour Ireland with receiving and wearing it.' Works, xvii. p. 53. Mrs. Howard, replying that the Princess would like some for herself and daughters, added :-'I shall take all particular precautions to have the money ready.' Ib. p. 75. Swift rejoined :—'The weaver has read Gulliver's book, and has no conception what you mean by returning money; and as to myself, I am so highly offended with such a base proposal,' &c. Ib. p. 78. On his return from his English visit of the following year he wrote to her :—'I shall pass the remainder of my life with the utmost gratitude for her Majesty's favours.' Ib. p. 141. On Nov. 10, 1730, he wrote to Gay :-'I made a present (to the Queen), or rather it was begged from me, of about £35. The trifle promised me, worth about £15, was never remembered. Pope's Works (Elwin and Courthope), vii. 205.
On Nov. 21 he wrote to Mrs. Howard that on his leaving England in 1726 the Queen promised to send him a medal. ‘Yet this was never done.' Works, xvii. 311. On Aug. 12, 1732, he wrote to Gay :
—They will not give me the medals they promised me; yet wheedled me out of a present that cost me £40. Pope's Works (Elwin and Courthope), vii. 282. '
In his Lines on the Death of Dr. Swift he wrote :
'The Queen, so gracious, mild and good,
These lines he 'durst not insert' at first. Works, xix. 174. The present he made grew in value from £35 to £40, while 'a medal' became the medals.' See also ib. xvii. 43, 86, 102, 221, 287. For the editions of this poem see N. & Q. 6 S. iii
. 109, xii. 395. Mrs. Barber was a Dublin woollen-draper by trade, 'poetically given,' writes Swift; 'for a woman she had a sort of genius that way.' Works, xvii. 367.
of Johnson's criticism of Swift Scott writes : It is unpleasant to observe one man of genius pass such harsh and undeserved censures on another.' After quoting Swift's letter to Pope on the subject (Works, xvii. 368), he continues :- Can this be fairly termed shuffling?' and adds that probably Mrs. Barber or a friend was the forger. Ib. i. 355. The same indirect denial Swift made also to the Countess of Suffolk. Ib. xvii. 371. Deane Swift wrote to Nichols in 1778:- The original letter, which was given by the Queen to the Countess, who gave it to Mr. Pope to enclose to the Doctor, is still in my possession.' Lit. Hist. V. 378. It is endorsed by Swift :- Counterfeit letter from me to the Queen, sent to me by Mr. Pope; dated June 22, 1731; received July 19, 1731 ; given by the Countess of Suffolk.' Works, xvii. 358.
It is unlikely that Mrs. Barber forged the letter. On Oct. 26, 1731, Swift described her to the Countess as 'a woman of piety and genius.' Two years later, in his Dedication of her Poems to Lord Orrery, he spoke of 'her good sense, her humility and many other virtues. 16. x. 381. In 1736 he gave her the copyright of some of his writings. Ib. xix. 8. It seems not unlikely that he wrote the letter as a jest, and that it was copied and sent to the Queen.
APPENDIX J (PAGE 9)
Malone asks :- How does it appear that Stella's father was steward to Sir William Temple?' Johnson's Works, viii. 197 n. There is no mention in Temple's will of her father. The bequest runs thus :'I leave a lease of some lands in Monistone in the County of Wicklow, in Ireland, to Esther Johnson, servant to my sister Giffard.' Courtenay's Life of Temple
, ii. 484. Servant had then a more extended meaning. .
. Orrery, who states that Stella was 'the daughter of Temple's steward' (Remarks, p. 22), perhaps confused Mrs. Johnson's first husband, an unsuccessful merchant (Gent. Mag. 1757, p. 488), who, according to Forster (Life of Swift, p. 85), had been closely in the confidence of Temple, with her second husband Mosse, who was his agent. For the difficult question of Stella's parentage see Wilde's Closing Years of Dean Swift, p. 108.
ILLIAM BROOME was born in Cheshire, as is said, of 1
very mean parents. Of the place of his birth or the first part of his life I have not been able to gain any intelligence! He was educated upon the foundation at Eaton, and was captain of the school a whole year without any vacancy by which he might have obtained a scholarship at King's College”. Being by this delay, such as is said to have happened very rarely, superannuated}, he was sent to St. John's College by the contributions of his friends, where he obtained a small exhibition
At his College he lived for some time in the same chamber 2 with the well-known Ford, by whom I have formerly heard him described as a contracted scholar and a mere versifyer, unacquainted with life, and unskilful in conversation. His addiction to metre was then such that his companions familiarly called him 'Poet.' When he had opportunities of mingling with mankind he cleared himself, as Ford likewise owned, from great part of his scholastick rust.
He appeared early in the world as a translator of the Iliads 3
· He was the son of a farmer at procure from College or University Haslington in Cheshire, and was registers all the dates, or other inbaptized May 3, 1689. [Barlow's formations which they can supply reMemoir of Broome, App. and p. 6.] lating to Ambrose Philips, Broome
: Post, COLLINS, 3; YOUNG, 5. and Gray, who were all of Cambridge.' Nichols, in 1780, called his failure Boswell's Johnson, iii. 427. 'the almost unheard-of misfortune, Three weeks later he told Nichols as it has happened but four times in that he had no answer. Johnson 160 years, viz. in 1619, 1653, 1707, Letters, ii. 180. Broome entered St. 1756. Select Collection of Poems, John's College in 1708 as a subsizar iv. 283.
-half scholar, half servant. Pope's Post, COLLINS, 3; YOUNG, 5. Works (Elwin and Courthope), viii. * Johnson wrote, on May 25, 1780, 30. to Dr. Farmer, Master of Emmanuel s Ante, FENTON, 13. College, Cambridge, asking him to
into prose' in conjunction with Ozelland Oldisworth ? How their several parts were distributed is not known. This is the translation of which Ozell boasted as superior, in Toland's opinion, to that of Pope *: it has long since vanished, and is now
in no danger from the criticks. 4 He was introduced to Mr. Pope, who was then visiting Sir
John Cotton at Madingley near Cambridge, and gained so much of his esteem that he was employed, I believe, to make extracts from Eustathius for the notes to the translation of the Iliad '; and in the volumes of poetry published by Lintot, commonly called Pope's Miscellanies’, many of his early pieces were
inserted. 5 Pope and Broome were to be yet more closely connected.
When the success of the Iliad gave encouragement to a version of the Odyssey Pope, weary of the toil, called Fenton and Broome to his assistance, and, taking only half the work upon
[Into blank verse. It was pub- Timothy's' was A Dialogue between lished in 1712 in 5 vols. 12mo. Timothy and Philatheus, 1709, 8vo. Johnson may well call it prose, for * Pope, in a note on The Dunciad, the translation is printed as prose, no i. 286, quotes the following from 'an regard being paid to lines. Ozell, advertisement' signed John Ozell,' moreover, in his preface to the first in the Weekly Medley, Sept. 20, 17:29: volume, after stating that 'blank verse —'As to my learning, this envious seems to be the only proper measure wretch knew, and every body knows, for an English translation of Homer,' that the whole bench of Bishops, not continues :-"The translator may end long ago, were pleased to give me a his line with long words of two, three, purse of guineas for discovering the and sometimes four syllables, which erroneous translations of the Comis one of Homer's beauties. Ozell's mon-prayer in Portuguese, Spanish, version of Iliad i begins (reproducing French, Italian, &c. . . And Mr. it as it is printed) Sing, Goddess, Toland and Mr. Gildon publicly dethe Resentment of Achilles, the Son clared Ozell's translation of Homer of Peleus; that accurs'd Resentment.' to be, as it was prior, so likewise
The first volume of a second edition superior to Pope's.' appeared in 1714-The Iliad of Broome published also versions of Homer Translated from the Greek parts of the Iliad 'in the style of into Blank Verse. Broome trans- Milton. Eng. Poets, xliv. 198, 238. lated Books x-XV, contained in vol. [These are a great improvement on ii. Other editions were published in the prose-like doggerel of his render1722 and 1734. Brit. Mus. Cata.) ing of the same passages in his trans
3. Mr. Ozell has obliged the world lation of the complete books in 1712.] with a great many valuable transla- 5. He married (1716] a sister of tions. Jacob's Poet. Reg. i. 198. Pope's friend Craggs [post, POPE,
Ante, SMITH, 2. According to 404].'. Pope's Works (Elwin and Pope Lintot exclaimed :—I'll say Courthope), viii. 3o; post, BROOME, 11. that for Oldisworth (though I lost by 6 Post, POPE, 87; Pope's Works his Timothy's), he translates an ode (Elwin and Courthope), viii. 32, 35. of Horace the quickest of any man ? Published in Lintot's Miscelin England.' Pope's Works (Elwin laneous Poems and Translations. By and Courthope), X. 207. His several Hands, 1712.