Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

down was wrong, that because redress of a grievance could be obtained elsewhere, therefore the House should not be applied

to.

The Attorney General said, that there were scores of men at the British bar who would do their duty without any regard to the political opinions of those whose interests they were intrusted with.

Lord Folkestone would not consent to withdraw his motion, unless he understood that it would appear on the journals of the House.

be done to all parties. Even if a verdict were obtained in favour of the petitioner in a court of law, such a result might not be thought sufficient to render farther parliamentary proceedings on the subject unnecessary. He did not doubt but that many gentlemen of the bar would be found willing to support the cause of the petitioner; but he was uncertain whether, even though he sued in forma pauperis, stamp duties must not be paid.

The Attorney General said, that persons sueing in forma pauperis were not liable to the payment of stamp duties. Lord Folkestone having finally con

The Speaker informed the noble lord, that this and every other motion was entered on the journals of the House, what-sented to withdraw his motion, the petition ever fate attended it. was ordered to lie on the table.

The

COMMITTEE OF SUPPLY.] Chancellor of the Exchequer moved the order of the House, that the House should go into a committee, to consider of a supply to be granted to his majesty.

Lord Cochranestated, that the bills pulled down purported to have been printed by Downes, printer to the police offices; that they had been issued under the direction of the magistrates, and that officers had attended the posting up of them, and were afterwards stationed to watch whether any per- Mr. Ponsonby did not rise for the purson would tear them down or deface them, pose of opposing the substance of this that the person so offending might be motion, as he was perfectly aware that a dragged before the magistrates, to be supply must be granted; but he rose to treated by them as they thought proper. say, that as a committee had been proHe felt that unless the subject was exa- posed, he meant to apprize the noble lord, mined by a committee, no certain know- that if he did not take effectual steps on ledge of the circumstances could be col- Friday for the appointment of that comlected; for police officers, and others, mittee, he would himself submit a motion might prevaricate and conceal the facts, to the House on that subject. He was not which they could never venture to do be- aware, whether the noble lord had been a fore the House or a committee. He ad-party to the delay before, but it was of the mired the dexterity of those who now argued against having the subject submitted to the House of Commons before it received the decision of a court of justice, remembering that the very same persons, not long since, argued against the interference of the House in cases on which a court of justice had already determined. By such reasoning the House would be precluded altogether from exercising any control over judicial concerns.

Mr. Ponsonby expressed a wish that the noble lord would withdraw his motion till the promised report was made by the right hon. secretary. He would not be prevented from bringing it forward again, should the result be unsatisfactory. The fullest investigation had been promised, and the noble lord should allow time for its being made. If he would not consent to withdraw his motion, he might move as an amendment, that the consideration of it be deferred till the report of his majesty's minister be received. The matter was of the greatest importance. Justice must

utmost importance to the country that no further time should be lost.

Lord Castlereagh said, his motive for altering the day from Thursday to Friday was not for the sake of delay, but because it would be more convenient for the statement which he should have to make to the House. He was most anxious to submit to the House what his majesty's ministers thought it most advantageous to propose to parliament under the existing circumstances of the country. The right hon. gentleman could not be more anxious on that subject than he was.

The House then went into the commit

tee. On the motion, that a supply be granted,

Mr. Calcraft had no objection to the motion, but was desirous to know what course was to be pursued on Friday. Did the noble lord mean to follow up his statement by the appointment of a committee; and if so, was that committee to be chosen by ballot, or in the ordinary way? With respect to the general subject of a commit

tee of supply, he wished to know from the chancellor of the exchequer, whether he meant to relinquish any tax that would come home to the pockets and feelings of the country at large? for he considered it absolutely necessary that some taxation should be remitted to the people. Under the existing state of affairs, the increased population of the country could not maintain themselves by their labour. Almost the whole of the labouring classes were supported out of the poor-rates of the country; and unless something should be done to relieve their distresses, let peace continue, let commerce flourish, let agri culture revive, they could not maintain themselves, unless they were still assisted out of the parish rates. These rates, however, had now become so great, that it was almost impossible to increase them; and, therefore, he wished to ascertain, whether it was intended to apply the sinking fund to the relief of the country. He was strongly of opinion, that it would be the most advantageous course to take a portion of that fund to supply some of the taxes that press so heavily on the labouring classes of the community.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer said, that the great question of providing the means of a supply was such as must necessarily come under the consideration of the House; and, therefore, however his mind might be made up on the subject, he should refrain from entering into any detail, until he saw to what the general statement might lead.

Mr. Calcraft replied, that this answer was much more acceptable than the reserve of the noble lord. He could not, indeed, expect more from the right hon. gentle man on this occasion. He thought it his duty, however, to repeat the question, whether the noble lord had intended to choose the committee by ballot or by taking names?

Lord Castlereagh declined giving any answer until he had an opportunity of stating to the House the line of conduct which he meant to adopt.

[blocks in formation]

Lord Sidmouth rose and said :-My lords; I rise to propose to your lordships an Address to his royal highness the Prince Regent, in answer to the Message which I brought down yesterday by his Royal Highness's command. My lords, it will be readily imagined by your lordships, that such a communication could not be made to this House, without strong feelings of pain and regret on the part of the illustrious person, by whose command it was submitted to the House. It is, indeed, my lords, a most afflicting consideration, that it should be announced to your lordships, to this country, and to the world, that information has been received, of certain practices, meetings, and combinations, tending to alienate the affections of his majesty's subjects, to endanger the public tranquillity, to bring into hatred and contempt his majesty's government, and to overthrow the whole system of our laws and constitution! and your lordships will, I am sure, readily believe, that such a communication could not, and would not have been made, except under circumstances of peculiar and inevitable necessity. My lords, if it should be your lordships pleasure, as I have no doubt it will be, to concur in an address to his royal highness the Prince Regent, in answer to his gracious message, such a one shall be proposed, as, I trust, will be considered proper, because it shall not pledge your lordships to any measure beyond the mere consideration of the papers. Under all the circumstances of the case, I shall propose to your lordships, that the information referred to in the message of his Royal Highness be referred to a committee of secrecy, and, in making this statement, I naturally feel, that it is not proper, it is not possible, that I should now enter into any explanation relative to the information contained in those documents. I shall also abstain from making any reference to any ulterior measures that may arise from the proceedings of the committee. On this point, my lords, nothing can be done, and nothing ought to be said, until the report of the committee, if it be your pleasure to appoint one, is laid on your lordships table. My lords, all I have to request of your lordships is, that you will abstain from making up your minds, if I may be allowed to use the expression, with respect to the course which it may be expedient, or inexpedient, to follow, after your lordships are in possession of the information which shall be laid before

[ocr errors]

you. On this subject I will not say a word. All I ask of your lordships is, to suspend your opinions and judgments, until the Report is on your table-until you have an opportunity of reading and fully considering it. There is only one other observation, which I now think it proper to offer. It is this-that the communication made on this occasion, is, in no degree, founded on, or connected with, that shameful outrage upon the Prince Regent, which, I am sure, is contemplated, not by your lordships only, or by the other House of Parliament, but by the great body of the people of this country, with detestation and horror. If that outrage had not been committed, if that indignity had not been offered to his Royal Highness's person, his majesty's ministers, being in possession of the information which will be laid before your lordships this day, would have found it necessary to have submitted to your lordships those documents which are referred to in the message from the Prince Regent. My lords, I shall now content myself by moving, "That an humble Address be presented to his royal highness the Prince Regent, to return his Royal Highness the thanks of this House for his most gracious message, and to assure his Royal Highness that this House will proceed to take the information, which by his Royal Highness's commands has been laid before them, into their immediate and serious consideration.".

Earl Grovesnor. My lords, the noble viscount has undoubtedly made a most tremendous charge against a large portion of the people of this country. I trust that charge will not be sustained; but at all events, your lordships cannot but acquiesce in the proposition of the noble viscount, for going into this committee, after such a serious such a momentous charge. Of this, however, I am convinced, that, let the disaffection be great or trivial, it has been provoked by the disposition which has been manifested, on many occasions, by his majesty's ministers to their faces against every species of reform, and pertinaciously to oppose every thing like extended and efficient retrenchment.

Lord Holland. My lords, to the motion made by the noble viscount, and to the whole course of proceeding recommended by him, it is impossible, in my humble opinion, to make any objection, when a message of this nature has been sent down from the throne. The state(VOL. XXXV.)

It

ment, that such serious communications* were to be made, is quite sufficient to authorize your lordships to enter into the ordinary course of examinations hitherto adopted on such occasions. When meetings and combinations are stated to exist, by which the constitution of the country is endangered, the line proposed to be taken by the noble viscount is undoubtedly the correct one. I do not rise, therefore, my lords, to object to this proceeding. But still, I should not leave this House at all satisfied with myself, if I did not express the deep regret I feel on this occasion, that such a communication should be made, whether it has proceeded from improper practices on the part of individuals, or from the intention of any one, in power, or out of power, to create a false alarm, at this period, throughout the country. was but yesterday that a noble friend of mine presented a petition to this House, containing a statement of severe personal grievance and oppression; which petition your lordships rejected. And on what ground did your lordships reject it? On this ground-that the individual, so petitioning the House, had his redress at common law. I feel that the rejection of that petition was proper. But, I hope, that the same justice will be exercised in this case, as was manifested in that. I hope that the even hand of justice will deal out the same measure to the powerful, as to the powerless :-and that, when the noble viscount says, that some proceedings have taken place, which demand the notice of parliament, he will go farther, and, prove, that they are of such a nature as to preclude any redress by common course of law. This, at all times, is a principle, that ought to guide ministers in proceedings of this sort-but ought now to be particularly attended to. In a time of peace, when no apprehension can be entertained from a foreign enemy-in a time of dreadful distress amongst the people of this country, which naturally renders them anxious to see the legislature and the representatives of the nation conduct themselves in such a manner as to prove the substantial benefits of the constitution, by devising means for their relief-at such a period, measures of a harsh nature ought to be deeply considered before they are adopted. I perfectly agree in the observation of the noble viscount, that it is not fit, at the

The petition of Thomas Dugood, see p. 183.

(0)

present moment, to say any thing of the ulterior measures that may be proposed. I therefore trust, that those who may go into this committee will form their judgment and opinion on an unbiassed view of the nature of the case. But it would be, I think, a matter of deep regret, if the investigation of the practices alluded to in the Prince Regent's message, should, at this period, lead, in the judgment of your lordships, to the enactment of any law that may tend to abridge the liberty of the subject. It is unnecessary to say, in a British House of Lords, that any law, tending to abridge the rights of the people, is, at all times, an evil of very great magnitude. But, if that evil be more intolerable at one time than another, the present is the period, when, by the admission of noble lords on all sides of the House, the people are groaning under the most unparalleled distress-when, in consequence of that distress, discontent has been generated-when doubts have arisen with respect to the conduct of government, and a hope has been cherished (fallacious perhaps), that parliament can apply a remedy to the existing evils, more immediately effectual, than, when we go into a consideration of the subject, we may possibly find ourselves able to devise. And here I must remark, that the period when those practices and combinations are said to have been entered into, must be a matter of great importance, and worthy of particular notice, in considering the measures to be hereafter adopted, because, I have felt it a point of congratulation to see, during the last four or five months, large bodies of the people looking to parliament for a redress of their grievances-for relief from their distresses. It will be for the noble viscount to explain to the House and to the country, why, when such a disposition to look to parliament for redress existed, it has been prorogued from time to time and why, when at length it has been called together, the first measure submitted to its consideration, at this critical period, has been one that implies distrust and jealousy of the people? I, my lords, will bring an unbiassed judgment to the consideration of this question; but I certainly think it a matter of fearful and discourag ing omen, that this session should commence with such a proposition. I am ready to believe what the noble viscount has stated, that it is unconnected with the outrage on the Prince Regent which no person (whatever the danger of that out

rage really might be) can look to without abhorence and detestation; but I must regret, I must deplore, that any necessity should be supposed to exist for such a proceeding. I have felt it necessary, my lords, for many reasons, to say thus much at present. On former occasions, when the noble viscount has brought down messages of a similar nature, I must confess I entertained some expectations founded on the noble viscount's own moderation, that he would prevent any results fatal to the liberties of the subject, as the consequence of such communications. I own, that there are many circumstances, at present, that lead me to form rather a contrary opinion; and, therefore, I take this opportunity of stating to your lordships, the distress and wretchedness to which this country would be exposed, if the necessity of a law of the sort that is contemplated, should not be fairly and completely made out, to the satisfaction of every man in this kingdom, before the liberty of the subject should be in the slightest degree contracted or abridged.

The Earl of Liverpool. My lords, I do not mean to trouble your lordships with more than a very few words on this occasion. According to what has been said by the noble lords opposite, no difference of opinion exists as to the mode of proceeding recommended by my noble friend. I cannot think-whatever diversity of senti-' ment there may be, either with respect to the internal state of the country, or with reference to the measures to be adopted under that situation of things-I cannot, my lords, conceive, that a more proper, a more constitutional, or, I will add, a more liberal proposition, could be introduced,' than that brought forward by my noble friend. The general circumstances, undoubtedly, to which the noble lord opposite has alluded, must naturally form a part of the consideration of the committee. But, it was the wish of government, in noticing those general circumstances, not to suffer the message, or the address in answer to it, to pledge parliament to any opinion whatever-either as to the neces sity of any farther measures to secure the internal peace and tranquillity of the country, or as to the propriety of letting matters remain as they are. I am sure the noble lord who spoke last will agree with me, that if his majesty's ministers were in possession of the information stated in the Prince Regent's message, they could not have performed their duty

low that it is not in time of peace and prosperity, when no distress is felt in the country that such efforts are likely to prevail and become successful. It must always be in time of difficulty, either internal or external, that such attempts can be successfully resorted to by the designing. What I am most anxious to do is this, to restate what is substantively contained in the speech from the throne; namely, that we are not disposed, for a moment to bring any charge against the great body of the people of this nation, whom I believe, most sincerely, to be firmly attached to the established constitution. But, my lords, we are not, on that account, to be insensible to the fact, that, in many periods of the history of this country, persons have been misled by the arts and delusions of others-and, therefore, the present state of things cannot be looked on with indifference. I trust, my lords,we shall not show that supineness and apathy which encourage danger, but that we shall keep our minds free from such feelings; and that, when the question comes regularly before us, we shall look at it without fear and without prejudice. We ought not to countenance any unnecessary infringement of the law, neither ought we to sacrifice, to mere names, that which is most essential to the security and wellbeing of the state.

in any other way so well as by bringing it before parliament, and, according to established precedent, submitting it to the consideration of a secret committee, so that no person should be bound to express an opinion, as to what should be done, or whether any thing ought to be done, until the circumstances were fully investigated. This is the course pursued on the present occasion. The House is not called on by the address to offer any opinion, and my noble friend has strongly desired, that no noble lord should prejudge the question, and form an opinion whatever it might be. I wish it to be therefore understood, that we go to this inquiry with unbiassed feelings. I hope that noble lords will restrain their minds from coming to a conclusion on this subject, until those who are on the committee have made their report, and they have all had an opportunity of seeing it, and of deciding fairly whether some ulterior proceedings should or should not be adopted. That decision will be formed, with every regard to the liberties of the subject-with a strong disposition not to infringe on the established laws of the country with every tenderness to the feelings of the people on the one hand, but, on the other, with a firm determination to uphold the constitution and government of the country. With respect to what has been stated, by a noble earl, who says, that there is a tremendous charge made against a great body of the people of this country, I would ask the noble earl, where does he find that charge? [Earl Grovesnor-" In the Speech."] Neither in the speech delivered on the first day of the session, nor in the message presented yesterday, and now taken into consideration, has such a charge been made. His royal highness, on the contrary, has been advised to declare, that the great body of the people of this country are loyal, and are arrayed against the attempts of disaffected and seditious persons, who might endeavour to draw them from their allegiance. My noble friend, who spoke last, adverted to the distresses of the time (which are admitted on all hands) as a consideration that should operate against the enactment of new measures. I admit the distresses of the time; but, if my noble friend considers the principle which he has advanced, he will perIceive that it is not tenable. Designing men, I know, will be at all moments disposed to do mischief and create confusion, if they can; but my noble friend will al

Earl Grosvenor, in explanation, said, that the charge must be supposed to have been brought against a large portion of the people, otherwise it would have been idle and unnecessary to have called the attention of their lordships to the subject.

Earl Grey. My lords, to the course of proceeding mentioned by the noble secretary of state, and by the noble earl who has recently spoken, I do not know that any objection has been offered by my noble friends near me, nor, indeed, that any objection can be made. Undoubtedly, if it be true that his majesty's ministers have obtained information of practices that threaten danger to the constitution, it was their duty to communicate it to parliament, and they could not do so in a more proper mode than by adopting the course which had been pursued on similar occasions. Whether that information is of such a nature as to render this communication necessary-whether it is of so much importance as to call for so grave a proceeding-is what we shall hereafter have to decide on; when, on a full consideration of the case, the whole matter

کو

« AnteriorContinuar »