Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence
What role has social status played in shaping the English language across the centuries? Have women also been the agents of language standardization in the past? Can apparent-time patterns be used to predict the course of long-term language change? These questions and many others will be addressed in this volume, which combines sociolinguistic methodology and social history to account for diachronic language change in Renaissance English. The approach has been made possible by the new machine-readable Corpus of Early English Correspondence (CEEC) specifically compiled for this purpose. The 2.4-million-word corpus covers the period from 1420 to 1680 and contains over 700 writers. The volume introduces the premises of the study, discussing both modern sociolinguistics and English society in the late medieval and early modern periods. A detailed description is given of the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, its encoding, and the separate database which records the letter writers' social backgrounds. The pilot studies based on the CEEC suggest that social rank and gender should both be considered in diachronic language change, but that apparent-time patterns may not always be a reliable cue to what will happen in the long run. The volume also argues that historical sociolinguistics offers fascinating perspectives on the study of such new areas as pragmatization and changing politeness cultures across time. This extension of sociolinguistic methodology to the past is a breakthrough in the field of corpus linguistics. It will be of major interest not only to historical linguists but to modern sociolinguists and social historians.
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
16th century according address forms appear brother Cambridge Cely Chapter choice clergy collections constructions Correspondence discussed documents earlier Early Modern English edited England evidence examples expression fact factors figures forms four frequencies gentry give given hand Helsinki Corpus Henry historical impersonal important included increased indicate individual instance issue John Johnson language language change Late later least letters linguistic London look lord material means merchants METHINKS METHOUGHT Middle Nevalainen nobility non-gentry official opinion original pattern period person phrase politeness positive possible present Present-day Press pronoun question ranks Raumolin-Brunberg reference relative represent Richard seems shows Signet social Society sociolinguistic standard status suggested Table texts THINK Thomas University upper gentry variables variant variant forms variety verb volume women writing written
Página 14 - Central to our model is a highly abstract notion of 'face' which consists of two specific kinds of desires ('face-wants') attributed by interactants to one another: the desire to be unimpeded in one's actions (negative face), and the desire (in some respects) to be approved of (positive face).
Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use
Douglas Biber,Susan Conrad,Randi Reppen
Vista previa limitada - 1998
Todos los resultados de la Búsqueda de libros »