...his testimony, pp. 269, 270.) It is true that the Government now is barred from attacking GM and GMAC under section 1 of the Sherman Act and section 7 of the Clayton Act if its case is based upon facts that existed in and prior to the year 1952. It can, however, bring...

...that we failed to give appropriate consideration to the policy of the antitrust laws as embodied in section 1 of the Sherman Act and section 7 of the Clayton Act; that we failed to afford the application of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company due consideration;...

...that we failed to give appropriate consideration to the policy of the antitrust laws as embodied in section 1 of the Sherman Act and section 7 of the Clayton Act; that we failed to afford the application of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company due consideration;...

...action — HR 71. This Is so, the argument goes, because although the GM-GMAC relationship violates Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Section 7 of the Clayton Act, the government Is helpless to proceed by Judicial action against the "unlawful combination" by reason...

...Reynolds, Sea-Land Service, Inc., Walter Kidde & Co. and United States Lines, for alleged violations of section 1 of the Sherman Act and section 7 of the Clayton Act because of agreements entered into for Reynolds' acquisition of United States Lines. The Commission...

...consider the facts of the merger as explained at the trial before him and considered the application of section 1 of the Sherman Act and section 7 of the Clayton Act — on the assumption that it was applicable. The opinion contains an interesting discussion of the...

...consider the facts of the merger as explained at the trial before him and considered the application of section 1 of the Sherman Act and section 7 of the Clayton Act — on the assumption that it was applicable. The opinion contains an interesting discussion of the...

...mentality that has made the Matson interests the object of Justice Department antitrust proceedings under section 1 of the Sherman Act and section 7 of the Clayton Act, which were filed on January 20, 1964, and are now pending. We do not question the good faith of the...

...itself of three San Bernardino newspapers which it acquired in June 1964 was filed in March, 1965, under Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Section 7 of the Clayton Act in the Southern District of California. The complaint charges the acquisition has increased and many...

...merger pursuant to an agreement entered into on March 12, 1964. The complaint charges violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Section 7 of the Clayton Act. On August 10, 1964, a motion was filed by the plaintiff for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Section...