...in Christianity or not, and whether they were Jews or infidels; so that we are compelled to admit, that although Christianity be a part of the common...annoyance of believers, or the injury of the public. Such was the doctrine of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in Updegraph vs. the Commonwealth, 11 Serg....

...in Christianity or not, and whether they were Jews or infidels. So that 'we are compelled to admit that although Christianity be a part of the common...annoyance of believers or the injury of the public. Such was the doctrine of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Updegraffv. The Commonwealth, 11 Serg....

...state, yet it is so in this I qualified sense, that its divine origin and truth are admitted, and I therefore it is not to be maliciously and openly reviled and blasphemed lagainst, to the annoyance of believers or the injury of the public. Such was the doctrine of the Supreme...

..." It is said, and truly, that the Christian religion is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania ; yet it is so in this qualified sense, that its Divine...annoyance of believers, or the injury of the public." With these principles before the Court, we are somewhat surprised that the provision of the will which...

...Christianity be a part of the common law of the State, yet it is so in this qualified sense,—that its divine origin and truth are admitted, and therefore...annoyance of believers or the injury of the public. Such was the doctrine of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Updegraff v. The Commonwealth, 11 Serg....

...Christianity is one of the great and leading bis is declared in the Charter of the State. Then the laws : origin and truth are admitted, and therefore it is...annoyance of believers or the injury of the public. Chancellor Kent. "Aman was indicted in Washington County, New York, in 1810, for blasphemy against...

...after referring to the qualifications in the Constitution, says: "So that we are compelled to admit, that although Christianity be a part of the common...annoyance of believers or the injury of the public." The same principle was decided by the State Court, in Updeyraph v. Commonwealth (11 #. & R. 394). The...

...says: " So that we are compelled to admit, that although Christianity be a part of the common law 6f the state, yet it is so in this qualified sense, that...annoyance of believers or the injury of the public." The same principle was decided by the state court, in Updegraff agt. Commonwealth, (11 S. 4r jR., 394.)...

...the Girard will case, that although Christianity is a part of the common law of the state, it is only so in this qualified sense, that its divine origin...blasphemed against, to the annoyance of believers or to the injury of the public.2 It may be doubted, however, if the punishment of blasphemy is based necessarily...

...believed in Christianity or not, and whether they were Jews or Inndels. So that we are compelled to admit that, although Christianity be a part of the common...annoyance of believers, or the injury of the public. Such was the doctrine of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Updegrajfv. The Commonwealth, II Serg....