« AnteriorContinuar »
6 Ed. 6. Br.
So if I devise the manor of D. by se, and murder are crimina paris gradus. For if Rigden's case. special name, of which at that time I a man persuade another to kill himself, and be am not seised, and after I purchase it, except I present when he doth so, he is a murderer. inake some new publication of my will, this But quære, if I. S. lay impoisoned devise is void; and the reason is, because that my fruit for some other stranger his enemy, prace, for death, which is the consummation of my will, is and his father or mother come and eat the act of God, and not my act, and therefore no it, whether this be petty treason, because it is not such act as the law requireth.
altogether crimen paris gradus. But if I grant unto I. S. authority by my deed to demise for years the land whereof I am now
REGULA XVI. seised, or hereafter shall be seised; and after I
Mandata licita recipiun. strictam interprelationein, purchase the lands, and I. S. my attorney doth
sed illicita lutam et extensam. demise them: this is a good demise, because the demise of my attorney is a new act, and all one In committing of lawful authority to another, a with a demise by myself.
man may limit it as strictly as it pleaseth him, But if I mortgage land, and after cove- and if the party authorized do transgress his
nant with I. S. in consideration of mo- authority, though it be but in circumstance es. ney which I receive of him, that after I have pressed, it shall be void in the whole act. entered for the condition broken, I will stand But when a man is author and monitor to seised to the use of the same J. S. and I enter, and another to commit an unlawful act, then he shall this deed is enrolled, and all within the six not excuse himself by circumstances not pursued. months, yet nothing passeth away, because this Therefore if I make a letter of attorney
10 H. 7. 19 enrolment is no new act, but a perfective cere- to I. S. to deliver livery and seisin in 5,16
16 El. Dy. 337. mony of the first deed of bargain and sale; and the capital messuage, and he doth it the law is more strong in that case, because of the in another place of the land; or between the vehement relation which the enrolment hath to hours of two and three, and he doth it after or the time of the bargain and sale, at what time he before; or if I make a charter of feoffinent to 1. D. Nad nothing but a naked condition.
and I. B. and express the seisin to be 16 El. Dy. 357. So if two joint tenants be, and one delivered to I. D. and my attorney de
of them bargain and sell the whole liver it to I. B. in all these cases the Dy. land, and before the enrolment his companion act of the attorney, as to execute the estate, is dieth, nothing passeth of the moiety accrued unto void; but if I say generally to I. D. whom I mean him by survivor.
only to enfeoff, and my attorney make it to his attorney, it shall be intended, for it is a livery to
a REGULA XV.
him in law.
But on the other side, if a man com- 1s El. Santer's In criminalibus sufficit generalis malilia intentionis mand I. S. to rob I. D. on Shooters. cas, com. 175 cum facto paris gradus.
hill, and he doth it on Gad's-hill; or to rob him All crimes have their conception in a corrupt such a day, and he doth it not himself but prointent, and have their consummation and issuing cureth I. B. to do it; or to kill him by poison, in some particular fact; which though it be not and he doth it by violence; in all these cases, the fact at which the intention of the malefactor notwithstanding the fact be not executed, yet he levelled, yet the law giveth him no advantage of is accessory nevertheless. that error, if another particular ensue of as high a But if it be to kill I. S. and he killeth nature.
I. D. mistaking him for I. S. then the Therefore if an impoisoned apple be acts are distant in substance, and he is not acces. laid in a place to poison I. S. and I. D. sory.
cometh by chance and eateth it, this is And be it that the facts be of differing degrees, murder in the principal that is actor, and yet the and yet of a kind. malice in individın was not against I. D.
As if a man bid I. S. to pilfer away such things So if a thief find the door open, and out of a house, and precisely restrain him to do it
come in by night and rob a house, and sometimes when he is gotten in without breaking be taken with the manner, and break a door to of the house, and yet he breaketh the house; yet escap”, this is burglary; yet the breaking of the he is accessory to the burglary; for a man cannot door was without any felonious intent, but it is condition with an unlawful act, but he must at vne entire act.
his peril take heed how he putteth himself into So if a caliver be discharged with a murderous another man's hands. intent at I. S. and the piece break and strike into
But if a man bid one rob I. S. as he is Eliz, in SatCave
the eye of him that dischargeth it, and goeth to Sturbridge-fair, and he rob der's case, pl
kirleth him, he is felo de se, and yet his him in his house, the variance seems intention was not to hurt himself; for felonia del to be of substance, and he is not accessory.
13 Eliz. Sander's case. COLE 474.
Cr. J. Peace, 30.
7 H. 7. 4.
21 Ass. 21.
7 H. 6. 37.
2 M. Dy. 114.
1 Mar 5.
21 H. 7. 40. 35.
SH. 4. 3.
And it seemeth in the case of maim, and some
other cases, that the court may disiniss themDe fide et officio judicis non recipitur quæstios sed
selves of discussing the matter by examination, de scientia, sive error sit juris sive facti.
and put it to a jury, and then the party grieved The law doth so much respect the certainty of shall have his attaint; and therefore it seerneth judgment, and the credit and author ty of judges, that the court that doth deprive a man of his as it will not permit any error to be assigned that action, should be subject to an action ; but that impeacheth them in their trust and office, and in notwithstanding the law will not have, as was wilful abuse of the same; but only in ignorance, said in the beginning, the judges called in quesand mistaking either of the law or of the case and tion in the point of their office when they undermatter in fact.
take to discuss the issue, and that is the true F. N. Br. fo. 21.
And therefore if I will assign for reason : for to say that the reason of these cases
error, that whereas the verdict passed should be, because trial by the court for the court received it contrary, and so gave should be peremptory as trial by certi- 1. 4. judgment against me, this shall not be accepted. ficate, (as by the bishop in case of
So if I will allege for error, that bastardy, or by the marshal of the king, &c.) the 3 H. 6. Ass. 3.
whereas I. S. offered to plead a suffi- cases are nothing alike; for the reason of those cient bar, the court refused it, and drave me from cases of certificate is, because if the court should it, this error shall not be allowed.
not give credit to the certificate, but should re-exBut the greatest doubt is where the amine it, they have no other mean but to write
court doth determine of the verity of again to the same lord bishop, or the same lord the matter in fact; so that is rather a point of marshal, which were frivolous, because it is not trial than a point of judgment, whether it shall be to be presumed they would differ from their re-examined in error.
former certificate; whereas in these other cases As if an appeal of maim be brought, of error the matter is drawn before a superior 24 AG PP. 15. and the court, by the assistance of the court, to re-examine the errors of an inferior court:
chirurgeons, adjudge it to be a maim, and therefore the true reason, as was said, that to whether the party grieved may bring a writ of examine again that which the court had tried error; and I hold the law to be he cannot. were in substance to attaint the court.
So if one of the prothonotaries of the And therefore this is a certain rule in error, that
Common Pleas bring an assize of his error in law is ever of such matters as were not ofice, and allege fees belonging to the same office crossed by the record; as to allege the death of
Mar. Dy. sq. in certainty, and issue is taken upon the tenant at the time of the judgment given, 5 Mar. Dý. 163. these fees, this issue shall be tried by nothing appeareth upon record to the contrary. the judges by way of examination, and if they So when the infant levies a fine, it determine it for the plaintiff, and he have judg- appeareth not upon the record that he ment to recover arrearages accordingly, the de- is an infant, therefore it is an error in fact, and fondant can bring no writ of error of this judgment, shall be tried by inspection during nonage. though the fees in truth be other.
But if a writ of error be brought in the King's So if a woman bring a writ of dower, Bench of a fine levied by an infant, and the court 2 E1. 24. 09. and the tenant plead her husband was by inspection and examination doth affirm the
alive, this shall be tried by proofs and fine, the infant, though it be during his infancy,
not hy jury, and upon judgment given shall never bring a writ of error in the Parliament on either side no error lies.
upon this judgment; not but that error So if nultiel record be pleaded, which lies after error, but because it doth now is to be tried by the inspection of the appear upon the record that he is now of full age,
record, and judgment be thereupon therefore it can be no error in fact. And given, no error lieth.
therefore if a man will assign for error So if in the assize the tenant saith, that fact, that whereas the judges gave
he is Counte de dale, et nient nosme judgment for him, the clerks entered it in the roll counte, in the writ, this shall be tried by the against him, this error shall not be allowed ; and records of the Chancery, and upon judgment given yet it doth not touch the judges but the clerks: bui no error lieth.
the reason is, if it be an error, it is an error in fact; So if a felon demand his clergy, and read well and you shall never allege an error in fact con. and distinctly, and the court who is judge thereof trary to the record. do put him from his clergy wrongfully, error shall never be brougḥt upon this attainder.
REGULA XVII. So if upon judgment given upon con. F. N. Br. 21. fession for default, and the court do Persona conjuncta æquiparatur interesse proprio. assess damages, the defendant shali never bring The law hath that respect of nature and cona writ, though the damage be outrageous. junction of blood, as in divers cases it comparesh
F. N. Br. 21.
43 A 28 41 Ass. 5. 39 Ass, 9.
2 R. 3. 20.
SEL. 4. 3.
F. N. Br. 21.
9 Ed. 4. 3.
2? Ass. pl. 24. 19 E4. 4. 6.
7 et S Eliz.
19 Ed. 4. 5. 19 E 1. 4. 22. 22 6. .
2:11. 6. 5.
14 11. 7. 2. 14 et 15 EI. 21 E 1. 75. Corn. 4. 25.
and matcheth nearness of blood with considera- This clausula derogatoria is by the corninon tion of profit and interest; yea, and in some cases practical term called clausula non obstante, de fue alloweth of it more strongly.
turo esse, the one weakening and disannulling any Therefore if a man covenant, in con- matter past to the contrary, the other any matter
sideration of blood, to stand seised to to come; and this latter is that only whereof we the use of his brother, or son, or near kinsman, a speak. use is well raised of this covenant without trans- The clausula de non obstante de futuro, the law mutation of possession ; nevertheless it is true, judgeth to be idle and of no force, because it doth that consideration of blood is not to ground a per- deprive men of that which of all other things is sonal contract upon; as if I contract with my son, most incident to human condition, and that is that in consideration of blood I will give unto him alteration or repentance. such a sum of money, this is a nudum pactum, and Therefore if I make my will, and in the end no assumpsit lieth upon it; for to subject me to thereof do add such like clause [Also my will is, an action, there needeth a consideration of benefit: if I shall revoke this present will, or declare any but the use the law raiseth without suit or action; new will, except the same shall be in writing, and besides, the law doth match real considera- subscribed with the hands of two witnesses, that tions with real agreements and covenants. such revocation or new declaration shall be utter.
So if a suit be commenced against me, ly void; and by these presents I do declare the
my son, or brother, I may maintain as same not to be my will, but this my former will 21 H. . 15
, 16. well as he in remainder for his interest, to stand] any such pretended will to the contrary
or his lawyer for his fee; and if my notwithstanding; yet nevertheless this clause or
brother have a suit against my nephew any the like never so exactly penned, and aithough or cousin, yet it is my election to maintain the it do restrain the revocation but in circumstance cause of my nephew or cousin, though the adverse and not altogether, is of no force or efficacy to party be nearer unto me in blood.
fortify the former will against the second; but I So in challenges of juries, challenge may by parole without writing repeal the same of blood is as good as challenge within will and make a new.
distress, and it is not material how far So if there be a statute made that no off the kindred be, so the pedigree can be con- sheriff shall continue in his office above 2004, 3; veyed in a certainty, whether it be of the half a year, and if any patent be made to 28. 7. & blood or whole.
the contrary, it shall be void ; and if there be any So if a man menace me, that he will clausula de non obstante contained in such patent imprison or hurt in body my father, or to dispense with this present act, that such clause my child, except I make such an obli- also shall be void ; yet nevertheless a patent of
gation, I shall avoid this duresse, as the sheriff's office made by the king, with a non well as if the duresse had been to mine own per- obstante, will be good in law contrary to such son: and yet if a man menace me, by taking statute, which pretendeth to exclude non obstantes; away or destruction of my goods, this is no good and the reason is, because it is an inseparable
duresse to plead : and the reason is, prerogative of the crown to dispense with politie because the law can make me repara. statutes, and of that kind; and then the deroga
tion of that loss, and so it cannot of tory clause hurteth not. the other.
So if an act of Parliament be made, wherein So if a man under the years of there is a clause contained that it shall not be
twenty-one contract for the nursing of lawful for the king, by authority of Parliament, his lawful child, this contract is good, and shall during the space of seven years, to repeal and not be avoided by infancy, no more than if he had determine the same act, this is a void clause, and contracted for his own aliments or erndition. such act may be repealed within the seven years;
and yet if the Parliament should enact in the naREGULA XIX.
ture of the ancient lex regia, that there should be
no more Parliaments held, but that the king Non impedit clausula derogatoria, quo minùs ab should have the authority of the Parliament; this
eadem potestate res dissolvantur, à quibus consti- act were good in law, quia potestas suprema seirtuuntur.
sum dissolvere potest, ligare non potest ; for as it Acts which are in their natures revocable, can. is in the power of a man to kill a man, but it is 101 by strength of words be fixed or perpetuated; not in his power to save him alive, and to restrain yet men have put in use two means to bind them- him from breathing or feeling; so it is in the selves from changing or dissolving that which power of a Parliament to extinguish or transfer They have set down, whereof one is clausula dio their own authority, but not, whilst the authority rogatoria, the other interpositio juramenti, where- remains entire, to restrain the functions and ex ut the former is only pertinent to this present ercises of the same authority. purpose.
So in the 28 of K. H. VIII. chap. 17, there was
15 H. 6. 17. 39 H. 6. 50. 21 Ed. 4, 13. 1911 6. 21. 15 E 1 4. 1.
39 H. 6. 91.
. 21. 20 Ass. I.
D cap 2
11 El. Dy. 313.
P. Comm, 563.
a statute made, that all acts that passed in the at the making of the first will to make some show minority of kings, reckoning the same under the of a new will, which nevertheless his intention years of twenty-four, might be annulled and was should not take place : but this was answered revoked by their letters patents when they came before; for if that clause were allowed to be good
to the same years; but this act in the until a revocation, then would no revocation at all
first of K. Ed. VI. who was then be- be made, therefore it must needs be void by ope. tween the years of ten and eleven, cap. 11, was ration of law at first. Thus much of clausula
repealed, and a new law surrogate in derogatoria.
place thereof, wherein a more reason. able liberty was given; and wherein, though
REGULA XX. other laws are made revocable according to the provision of the former law with some new form Actus inceptus, cujus perfectio pendet ex voluntate prescribed, yet that very law of revocation,
partium, revocari potest ; si autem pendet en Ligether with pardons,
voluntate tertiæ personæ, vel ex contigenti, non made irrevocable and
potest. perpetual, so that there is a direct contrariety between these two laws; for if the former stands, In acts that are fully executed and consum. which maketh all latter laws during the minority mate, the law makes this difference, thai if the of kings revocable without exception of any law first parties have put it in the power of a third per. whatsoever, then that very law of repeal is con- son, or of a contingency, to give a perfection to cluded in the generality, and so itself made revo- their acts, then they have put it out of their own cable : on the other side, that law making no reach and liberty; therefore there is no reason doubt of the absolute repeal of the first law, they should revoke them; but if the consumma. though itself were made during the minority, tion depend upon the same consent, which was which was the very case of the former law in the the inception, then the law accounteth it in vain new provision which it maketh, hath a precise to restrain them from revoking of it; for as they exception, that the law of repeal shall not be may frustrate it by omission and non feisance, al repealed.
a certain time, or in a certain sort or circumstance, But the law is, that the first law by the imper- so the law permitieth them to dissolve it by an tinency of it was void ab initio et ipso facto with express consent before that time, or without that out repeal, as if a law were made, and no new circumstance. statute should be made during seven years, and Therefore if two exchange land by deed, or the same statute be repealed within the seven without deed, and neither enter, they F. N. Br. 36. years, if the first statute should be good, then the may make a revocation or dissolution 13 H. 7. 13, 14. repeal could not be made thereof within that of the same exchange by mutual consent, so it be time; for the law of repeal were a new law, and by deed, but not by parole ; for as much as the that were disabled by the former law; therefore making of an exchange needeth no deed, because it is void in itself, and the rule holds, perpetua l x it is to be perfected by entry, which is a ceremony cst, nullam legem humanam ac positivam perpetuam notorious in the nature of a livery ; but it cannot esse; et clausula quæ abrogationem excludil initio be dissolved but by deed, because it dischargeth non valet.
that which is but title. Neither is the difference of the civil law so rea- So if I contract with I. D. that if he lay me into sonable as colourable, for they distinguish and my cellar three tuns of wine before say that a derogatory clause is good to disable Mich. that I will bring into his garner any latter act, except you revoke the same clause twenty quarters of wheat before Christmas, before before you proceed to establish any later disposi- either of these days the parties may by assent distion or declaration ; for they say, that clausula solve the contract; but after the first day there is a derogatoria ad alias sequentes voluntatis posita in perfection given to the contract by action on the testamento, (viz. si testator dicat quod si contigerit one side, and they may make cross releases by deed eum facere aliud testamentum non vult illud valere,) or parole, but never dissolve the contract; for there operatur quod sequens dispositio ab ipsa clausula is a difference between dissolving the contract, ana reguletur, et per consequens quod scquens dispositio release or surrender of the thing contracted for: as duretur sine voluntate, et sic quod non sit attenden. if lessee for twenty years make a lease for ten years, dum. The sense is, that where a former will is and after he take a lease for five years, yet this made, and after a later will, the reason why, without | cannot inure by way of surrender: for a petry an express revocation of the former will, it is by lease derived out of a greater cannot be surrenimplication revoked, is because of the repugnancy dered back again, but inureth only by dissolution between the disposition of the former and the of contract; for a lease of land is but a contract later.
executory from time to time of the profits of the But where there is such a derogatory clause, land, to arise as a man may sell his corn or his there can be gathered no such repugnancy : be- tithe to spring or to be perceived for divers futuro cause it seemeth that the testator had a purpose years. Vol. III.-31
F. 36 Eliz.
29 H. S Dy. 12.
11 H. 7. 19.
31 Ed. 1. F. Q Taip. 195. 14 Ed4. 2
14 Ed. 4. 2.
But to return from our digression : on the other | he doth alter the disposition of law; for siile, if I contract with you for cloth at such a by the law they shall take in copercenaprice as I. S. shall name; there if I. S. refuse to ry, but by the devise they shall take jointly; und naine, the contract is void; but the parties cannot this is not any foreign collateral purpose, but in discharge it, because they have put it in the point of taking of estate. power of a third person to perfect.
So if a man make a feoffment in fee to the use So if I grant my reversion, though of his last will and testament, these words of this be an imperfect act before atturn- special limitation are void, and the law reserveth
ment; yet because the atturnment is the ancient use to the feoffor and his heirs; and the act of a stranger, this is not simply revocable, yet if the words might stand, then might it be aubut hy a policy or circumstance in law, as by thority by his will to declare and appoint uses, levying a fine, or making a bargain and sale, or and then though it were knight's service land, he the like.
might dispose the whole. As if a man make a So if I present a clerk to the bishop, feoffment in fee, to the use of the will and testa
now can I not revoke this presentation, ment of a stranger, there the stranger may declare 33 El . 3. 33. because I have put it out of myself, a use of the whole by his will, notwithstanding
that is, the bishop, by admission, to it be knight's service land; but the reason of the perfect my act begun.
principal case is, because uses before the statute The same difference appeareth in nominations of 27 H. 8. were to have been disposed by will, and elections; as if I enfeoff such a one as I. D. and therefore before that statute a use limited in shall name within a year, and I. D. name I. B. the form aforesaid, was bat a frivolous limitation, yet before the feoffment, and within the year, I. in regard of the old use that the law reserved was D. may countermand his nomination, and name deviseable; and the statute of 27 altereth not the again, because no interest passeth out of him. law, as to the creating and limiting of 19 H. S. 11. But if I enfeoff 1. S. to the use of such a one as any use, and therefore after that statute, 5 Ed 4 & I. D. shall name within a year, then if I. D. name and before the statute of wills, when no land J. B. it is not revocable, because the use passeth could have been devised, yet was it a void limipresently by operation of law.
tation as before, and so continueth to this day. So in judicial acts the rule of the civil law But if I make a feoffment in fee to the use of holdeth sententia interlocutoria revocari poles', that my last will and testament, thereby to declare an is, that an order may be revoked, but a judgment estate tail and no greater estate, and after my cannot; and the reason is, because there is title death, and after such estate declared shall expire, of execution or bar given presently unto the party or in default of such declaration then to the use upon jadgment, and so it is out of the judge to of I. S. and his heirs, this is a good limitation; revoke, in courts ordered by the common law. and I may by my will declare a use of
the whole land to a stranger, though it Ed. 4 & REGULA XXI.
be held in knight's service, and yet I have an
estate in fee simple by virtue of the old use Clausula vel dispositio inutilis per presumptionem during life. remotam vel causam ex post facto non fulcitur.
So if I make a feoffment in fee to the Clausula vel disposilio inutilis are said when use of my right heirs, this is a void 20 H. & S the act or the words do work or express no more limitation, and the use reserved by the Eliz 237. than the law by intendment would have supplied ; law doth take place : and yet if the and therefore the doubling or iterating of that and limitation should be good the heir should come no more, which the conceit of law doth in a sort in by way of purchase, who otherwise cometh in prevent and preoccupate, is reputed nugation, and by descent; but this is but a circumstance which is not supported, and made of substance either by the law respecteth not, as was proved before. a foreign intendment of some purpose, in regard
But if I make a feoffment in fee to the use of whereof it might be material, nor upon any cause my right heirs, and the right heirs of I.
10 EI. ET4. emerging afterwards, which may induce an ope- S. this is a good use, because I have Dy. ration of those idle words.
altered the disposition of law; neither is it void And therefore if a man demise land for a moiety, but both our right heirs when they at this day to his son and heir, this is come in being shall take by joint pur.
a void devise, because the disposition chase; and he to whom the first falleth 30 € 1 Fitz. ut law did cast the same upon the heir by descent; shall take the whole, subject nevertheand yet if it be knight's service land, and the less to his companion's title, so it have not de neir within age, if he take by the devise, he shall scended from the first heir to the heir of the heir : have two parts of the profits to his own use, and for a man cannot be joint-tenant claiming by pur. The guardian shall have benefit but of the third ; chase, and the other by descent, because they be but if a man devise land to his two daughters, several titles. having no sons, then the devise is good, because So if a man having land on the part of his
19 H. & II.
32 7.8 D.
32 H. 8.
2 Ed. 3. 2