Two Minds: Intuition and Analysis in the History of Economic Thought

Portada
Springer Science & Business Media, 2005 - 178 páginas
As everyone knows, intuition is warm and fuzzy, qualitative, not measurable. Economics, on the other hand, is quantitative, and if it is not a hard science, at least it is the "queen of the social sciences." It is, therefore, intuitively obvious, that intuition and economics are as if oil and water. The problem is, what is intuitively obvious is not always correct. And, there are two major reasons why intuition and economics are not like oil and water. First, economics concerns itself with decision making, and decisions are made in the brain. The human brain is the size of a grapefruit, weighing three pounds with approximately 180 billion neurons, each physically independent but interacting with the other neurons. What we call intuition is, like decision making, a natural information processing function of the brain. Second, despite the current emphasis on quantitative analysis and deductive logic there is a rich history of economists speaking about intuition. First, the human brain, specifically the neocortex, has a left and right hemisphere. The specialized analytical style of the left hemisphere and the specialized intuitive style of the right hemispheres complement each other.
 

Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario

No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.

Contenido

Introduction
1
Adam Smith New Intuitions for a New Age
21
John Stuart Mill An AntiIntuitionist Social Reformer
39
Alfred Marshall Metaphysician and Economist
59
Intuition and Analysis in the Economics of the John Maynard Keynes
77
Frank Knight Intuition Risk and Uncertainty
95
Swimming Against the Stream Herbert Simon Harvey Leibenstein George Shackle Friedrich von Hayek
113
Intuition in Current Economic Literature
135
References
153
Index
173
Derechos de autor

Otras ediciones - Ver todas

Términos y frases comunes

Información bibliográfica