« AnteriorContinuar »
.N 590: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1714,
-Assiduo labuntur tempora motu
OVID. Met, xv. 179,
L'en times are in perpetual flux, and run,
the essays upon infinitude. • We consider infinite space as an expansion with out a circụmference: we consider eternity, or insi. pite duration, as a line that has neither a beginning nor an end. In our speculations of infinite space, we consider that particular place in which we exist as a kind of centre to the whole expansion. In our speculations of eternity, we consider the time which is present to us as the middle, which divides the whole line into two equal part. For this reason many witty authors compare the present time to an isthmus or narrow neck of land, that rises in the midst of an ocean, immeasurably diffused on either side of it.
Philosophy, and indeed common sense, natu. rally throws eternity under two divisions, which we may call in English that eternity which is past, and that eternity which is to come. The learned terms of Æternitas a parte ante, and Æternitas a parte post, may be more amusing to the reader, but can have no other idea affixed to them than what is conveyed to us by those words, an eternity that is past, and an eternity that is to come. Each of these eternities is bounded at the one extreme, or, in other words, the former has an end, and the latter a beginning.
• Let us first of all consider that eternity which is past, reserving that which is to come for the subject of another paper. The nature of this eternity is utterly inconceivable by the mind of man: our reason demonstrates to us that it has been, but at ! the same time can frame no idea of it, but what is big with absurdity and contradiction. We can have no other conception of any duration which is past, than that all of it was once present; and whatever was once present is at any certain distance from us, and whatever is at any certain distance from us, be the distance never so remote, cannot be eternity. The very notion of any duration being past implies that it was once present, for the idea of being once present is actually included in the idea of its being past. This therefore is a depth not to be sounded by human understanding. We are sure that there has been an eternity, and yet contradict ourselves when we measure this eternity by any notion which we can frame of it.
If we go to the bottom of this matter, we shall find that the faculties we meet with in our concep.
tions of eternity proceed from this single reason, that we can have no other idea of any kind of dura. tion, than that by which we ourselves, and all other created beings, do exist; which is, a successive duration made up of past, present, and to come. There is nothing which exists after this manner, all the parts of whose existence were not once actually present, and consequently may be reached by a certain number of years applied to it. We may ascend as high as we please, and employ our being to that eternity which is to come, in adding millions of years to millions of years, and we can never come up to any fountain head of duration, to any beginning in eternity : but at the same time we are sure that whatever was once present does lie within the reach of numbers, though perhaps we can never be able to put enough * of them together for that purpose. We
that any thing may be actually present in any part of infinite space, which does not lie at a certain distance from us, as that any part of infinite duration was once actually present, and does not also lie at some determined distance from us. The distance in both cases may be immeasurable and indefinite as to our faculties, but our reason tells us that it cannot be so in itself. Here therefore is that difficulty which human understanding is not capable of surmounting. We are sure that something must have existed from eternity, and are at the same time unable to conceive, that any thing which exists, according to our notion of existence, can have existed from eternity.
! It is hard for a reader, who has not rolled this thought in his own mind, to follow in such an ab. stracted speculation ; but I have been the longer on it, because I think it is a demonstrative argument
may as well
*Enow. The singular number is here used for the plural.
of the being and eternity of God: and, though there are many other demonstrations which lead us to this great truth, I do not think we ought to lay aside any proofs in this matter, which the light of reason has suggested to us, especially when it is such an
as has been urged by men famous for their penetration and force of understanding, and which appears altogether conclusive to those who will be at the pains to examine it.
Having thus considered that eternity which is past, according to the best idea we can frame of it, Í shall now draw up those several articles on this subject, which are dictated to us by the light of reason, and which may be looked upon as a creed of a philosopher in this great point.
First, it is certain that no being could have made itself; for, if so, it must have acted before it was, which is a contradiction
Secondly, That therefore some being must have existed from all eternity.
Thirdly, That whatever exists after the man. ner of created beings, or according to any notions which we have of existence, could fiot have existed from eternity.
• Fourthly, That this Eternal Being must there. fore be the great Author of nature, the Ancient of Days," who, being at an infinite distance in his perfections from all finite and created beings, exists in a quite different manner from them, and in a manner of which they can have no idea.
• I know that several of the schoolmen, who Would not be thought ignorant of any thing, have pretended to explain the manner of God's existence, by telling us that he comprehends infinite duration in every moment: that eternity is with him a punctum stans, a fixed point; or, which is as good sense, an infinite instant; that nothing with reference to his
existence is either past or to come: to which the ingenious Mr. Cowley alludes in his description of heaven :
« Nothing is there to come, and nothing past,
For my own part, I look
these propositions as words that have no ideas annexed to them: and think men had better own their ignorance than advance doctrines by which they mean nothing, and which, indeed, are self-contradictory. We cannot be too modest in our disquisitions when we meditate on him, who is environed with so much glory and perfection who is the source of being, the fountain of all that existence which we and his whole cre. ation derive from him. Let us therefore with the utmost humility acknowledge, that, as some being must necessarily have existed from eternity, so this being does exist after an incomprehensible manner, since it is impossible for a being to have existed from eternity after our manner or notions of existence. Revelation confirms these natural dictates of reason in the accounts which it gives us of the divine ex. istence, where it tells us, that he is the same yesterday, to-day, and for ever; that he is the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending ; that a thousand years are with him as one day, and one day as a thousand years : by which, and the like, expressions, we are taught that his existence with relation to time or duration is infinitely different from the existence of any of his crcatures and con. sequently that it is impossible for us to frame any adequate conceptions of it.
? In the first revelation which he makes of his own being he entitles himself, “ I Am that I Am;" and when Moses desires to know what name he shall