he agrees with Lord Byron, that the Epistle to Abelard is the height of the pathetic. Strange that such difference should be That it is in a great degree pathetic, we should be amongst the last to dispute; but its character is more properly rhetorical and voluptuous. That its interest is of the highest or deepest order, is what we should wonder to hear any one affirm, who is intimate with Shakspeare, Chaucer, Boccacio, our own early dramatists, or the Greek tragedians. There is more true, unfeigned, unspeakable, heartfelt distress in one line of Chaucer's tale just mentioned, Let me not like a worm go by the way, than in all Pope's writings put together; and we say it without any disrespect to him too. Didactic poetry has to do with manners, as they are regulated, not by fashion or caprice, but by abstract reason and grave opinion, and is equally remote from the dramatic, which describes the involuntary and unpremeditated impulses of nature. As Lord Byron refers to the Bible, we would just ask him here, which he thinks the most poetical parts of it, the Law of the Twelve Tables, the Book of Leviticus, &c.; or the Book of Job, Jacob's dream, the story of Ruth, &c.? 4. Supernatural poetry is, in the sense here insisted on, allied to nature, not to art, because it relates to the impressions made upon the mind by unknown objects and powers, out of the reach both of the cognizance and will of man, and still more able to startle and confound his imagination, while he supposes them to exist, than either those of nature or art. The Witches in Macbeth, the Furies in Æschylus, are so far artificial objects, that they are creatures of the poet's brain; but their impression on the mind depends on their possessing attributes, which baffle and set at nought all human pretence, and laugh at all human efforts to tamper with them. Satan in Milton is an artificial or ideal character: but would any one call this artificial poetry? It is, in Lord Byron's phrase, super-artificial, as well as super-human poetry. But it is serious business. Fate, if not Nature, is its ruling genius. The Pandemonium is not a baby-house of the fancy, and it is ranked (ordinarily), with natural, i. e. with the highest and most important order of poetry, and above the Rape of the Lock. We intended a definition, and have run again into examples. Lord Byron's concretions have spoiled us for philosophy. We will therefore leave off here, and conclude with a character of Pope, which seems to have been written with an eye to this question, and which (for what we know) is as near a solution of it as the Noble Letter-writer's em phatical division of Pope's writings into ethical, mock-heroic, and fanciful poetry. "Pope was not assuredly a poet of this class, or in the first rank of it. He saw nature only dressed by art; he judged of beauty by fashion; he sought for truth in the opinions of the world; he judged of the feelings of others by his own. The capacious soul of Shakspeare had an intuitive and mighty sympathy with whatever could enter into the heart of man in all possible circumstances: Pope had an exact knowledge of all that he himself loved or hated, wished or wanted. Milton has winged his daring flight from heaven to earth, through Chaos and old Night. Pope's Muse never wandered with safety, but from his library to his grotto, or from his grotto into his library back again. His mind dwelt with greater pleasure on his own garden, than on the garden of Eden; he could describe the faultless wholelength mirror that reflected his own person, better than the smooth surface of the lake that reflects the face of heaven-a piece of cut glass or a pair of paste buckles with more brilliance and effect, than a thousand dew-drops glittering in the sun. He would be more delighted with a patent lamp, than with "the pale reflex of Cynthia's brow," that fills the skies with its soft silent lustre, that trembles through the cottage window, and cheers the watchful mariner on the lonely wave. In short, he was the poet of personality and of polished life. That which was 5 nearest to him, was the greatest; the fashion of the day bore sway in his mind over the immutable laws of nature. He preferred the artificial to the natural in external objects, because he had a stronger fellow-feeling with the self-love of the maker or proprietor of a gewgaw, pre than admiration of that which was interesting to all mankind. He ferred the artificial to the natural in passion, because the involuntary and uncalculating impulses of the one hurried him away with a force and vehemence with which he could not grapple; while he could trifle with the conventional and superficial modifications of mere sentiment at will, laugh at or admire, put them on or off like a masquerade-dress, make much or little of them, indulge them for a longer or a shorter time, as he pleased; and because while they amused his fancy and exercised his ingenuity, they never once disturbed his vanity, his levity, or indifference. His mind was the antithesis of strength and grandeur; its power was the power of indifference. He had none of the enthusiasm of poetry; he was in poetry what the sceptic is in religion. "It cannot be denied, that his chief excellence lay more in diminishing, than in aggrandizing objects; in checking, not in encouraging our en thusiasm; in sneering at the extravagances of fancy or passion, instead of giving a loose to them; in describing a row of pins and needles, rather than the embattled spears of Greeks and Trojans; in penning a lampoon or a compliment, and in praising Martha Blount. "Shakspeare says, In Fortune's ray and brightness The herd hath more annoyance by the brize Than by the tyger: but when the splitting wind Makes flexible the knees of knotted oaks, As roused with rage, with rage doth sympathise ; And with an accent tuned in the self-same key, Replies to chiding Fortune. There is none of this rough work in Pope. His Muse was on a peaceestablishment, and grew somewhat effeminate by long ease and indulgence. He lived in the smiles of fortune, and basked in the favour of the great. In his smooth and polished verse we meet with no prodigies of nature, but with miracles of wit; the thunders of his pen are whispered flatteries; its forked lightnings pointed sarcasms; for "the gnarled oak," he gives us "the soft myrtle:" for rocks, and seas, and mountains, artificial grass-plats, gravel-walks, and tinkling rills; for earthquakes and tempests, the breaking of a flower-pot, or the fall of a china jar; for the tug and war of the elements, or the deadly strife of the passions, we have Calm contemplation and poetic ease. Yet within this retired and narrow circle how much, and that how exquisite, was contained! What discrimination, what wit, what delicacy, what fancy, what lurking spleen, what elegance of thought, what pampered refinement of sentiment! It is like looking at the world through a microscope, where every thing assumes a new character and a new consequence, where things are seen in their minutest circumstances and slightest shades of difference; where the little becomes gigantic, the deformed beautiful, and the beautiful deformed. The wrong end of the magnifier is, to be sure, held to every thing, but still the exhibition is high ly curious, and we know not whether to be most pleased or surprised. Such, at least, is the best account I am able to give of this extraordinary man, without doing injustice to him or others." THE SHRIEK OF PROMETHEUS. SUGGESTED BY A PASSAGE IN THE SECOND BOOK OF APOLLONIUS RHODIUS. Fresh was the breeze, and the rowers plied The Sacred Mount, and Aretia's strands, On their right Bechiria's coast appears, At distance they saw the sun-beams quiver As it flung from its rocky mouth the flood. The Argonauts gaze with hungry eyes Laocoon bade the rowers check Their oars as the sun to the water slanted, THE HYMN OF ORPHEUS. Twin-born with Dian in the Delos isle, CHORUS. When thou'rt dim, our harp and hymn Hail to thee, Apollo! God of the art that heals the shatter'd frame, CHORUS. When thou'rt dim, our harp and hymn Thy downward course shall follow: Hail to thee, Apollo! VOL. III. Thy golden bow emits a gushing strain Of music when the Pythian serpent dies; CHORUS. When thou'rt dim, our harp and hymn Hail to thee, Apollo ! Pan of his pipe and rural science proud, Dreamt that his music might with thine aspire ; The mountain Tmolus was the judge-and bow'd His nodding woods in homage to thy lyre. CHORUS. When thou'rt dim, with harp and hymn Hail to thee, Apollo! From bowers of Daphne on Parnassus' Mount The gifted Muses by Castalia's fount, With choral symphonies salute their king. CHORUS. When thou'rt dim, with harp and hymn Hail to thee!-hail to thee! Hail to thee, Apollo ! God of the golden lyre and laurel wreath, To thee each poet turns with yearning heart With a start The minstrel ceased, for over all the bark The Argonauts look'd up and saw a dark Phlias, the son of Bacchus, seized his bow, Extending now his oar-like wings, 7 And clove the northward distance, where In desolate state beneath their crowns of snow. Upon whose rocky floor environ'd round With adamantine chains Prometheus lies bound.— Thither the ravenous wonder wing'd his flight— Is fix'd upon the spot, and every heart Still do they gaze, half-willing to dismiss Gracious God, what a shriek ! The monster with his beak Is tearing out his victim's heart! And throws its fear afar, a start Of horror seems to darken nature's face.- Earth trembles to her very base, Air seems to swoon-the sky to frown The sun with ghastly glare shrinks faster down. Hark! what a furious clash of chains! Victim! thou never can'st unlock The brazen bolts that root thee to the rock; Wrung from the very depths of agonies;- But still with thrilling breasts and steadfast eyes Th' arrested vessel shakes, The flapping main-sail quakes, And all seem'd turn'd to statues at the sight. All but the son of Bacchus, who With flashing eyes and visage red, When from the eagle's beak a drop of gore, |