Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]

that of a man of violence, or a Ruffian in years, as Harry calls him, or any thing else, it answers my purpose; how insignificant soever the characters or incidents to be first produced may otherwise appear;-for these Impressions must have been taken either from personal knowledge and observation; or, what will do better for my purpose, from common fame. Altho' I must admit some part of this evidence will appear so weak and trifling that it certainly ought not to be produced but in proof Impression only.

The Hostess Quickly employs two officers to arrest Falstaff: On the mention of his name, one of them immediately observes, "that it may chance to cost some of "them their lives, for that he will stab."-" Alas a day," says the hostess," take heed of him, he cares not what mischief he "doth; if his weapon be out, he will foin like any devil; "He will spare neither man, woman, or child." Accordingly, we find that when they lay hold on him he resists to the utmost of his power, and calls upon Bardolph, whose arms are at liberty, to draw. Away, varlets, draw Bardolph, cut me off the villain's head, throw the quean in the "kennel." The officers cry, a rescue, a rescue! But the Chief Justice comes in and the scuffle ceases. In another scene, his wench Doll Tearsheet asks him "when he will

"leave fighting ****** and patch up his old body for "heaven.' This is occasioned by his drawing his rapier, on great provocation, and driving Pistol, who is drawn likewise, down stairs, and hurting him in the shoulder. To drive Pistol was no great feat; nor do I mention it as such; but upon this occasion it was necessary. "A "Rascal bragging slave," says he, "the rogue fled from me "like quicksilver": Expressions which, as they remember the cowardice of Pistol, seem to prove that Falstaff did not value himself on the adventure. Even something may be drawn from Davy, Shallow's serving man, who calls Falstaff, in ignorant admiration, the man of war. I must observe here, and I beg the reader will notice it, that there is not a single expression dropt by these

people, or either of Falstaff's followers, from which may be inferred the least suspicion of Cowardice in his character; and this is I think such an implied negation as deserves considerable weight.

But to go a little higher, if, indeed, to consider Shallow's opinion be to go higher: It is from him, however, that we get the earliest account of Falstaff. He remembers him a Page to Thomas Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk: "He broke," says he, "Schoggan's head at the Court-Gate "when he was but a crack thus high." Shallow, throughout, considers him as a great Leader and Soldier, and relates this fact as an early indication only of his future Prowess. Shallow, it is true, is a very ridiculous character; but he picked up these Impressions somewhere; and he picked up none of a contrary tendency.-I want at present only to prove that Falstaff stood well in the report of common fame as to this point; and he was now near seventy years of age, and had passed in a Military line thro' the active part of his life. At this period common fame may be well considered as the seal of his character; a seal which ought not perhaps to be broke open on the evidence of any future transaction.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

But to proceed. Lord Bardolph was a man of the world, and of sense and observation. He informs Northumberland, erroneously indeed, that Percy had beaten the King at Shrewsbury. "The King," according to him, "was wounded; the Prince of Wales and the two Blunts slain, certain Nobles, whom he names, had escaped by 'flight, and the Brawn Sir John Falstaff was taken prisoner.' But how came Falstaff into this list? Common fame had put him there. He is singularly obliged to Common fame. But if he had not been a Soldier of repute, if he had not been brave as well as fat, if he had been mere brawn, it would have been more germane to the matter if this lord had put him down among the baggage or the provender. The fact seems to be that there is a real consequence about Sir John Falstaff which is not brought forward: We see him only in his familiar hours;

we enter the tavern with Hal and Poins; we join in the laugh and take a pride to gird at him: But there may be a great deal of truth in what he himself writes to the Prince, that tho' he be "Jack Falstaff with his Familiars, "he is Sir John with the rest of Europe." It has been remarked, and very truly I believe, that no man is a hero in the eye of his valet-de-chambre; and thus it is, we are witnesses only of Falstaff's weakness and buffoonery; our acquaintance is with Jack Falstaff, Plump Jack, and Sir John Paunch; but if we would look for Sir John Falstaff, we must put on, as Bunyan would have expressed it, the spectacles of observation. With respect, for instance, to his Military command at Shrewsbury, nothing appears on the surface but the Prince's familiarly saying, in the tone usually assumed when speaking of Falstaff, "I will procure this fat rogue "a Charge of foot"; and in another place, "I will procure "thee Jack a Charge of foot; meet me to-morrow in the Temple Hall." Indeed we might venture to infer from this, that a Prince of so great ability, whose wildness was only external and assumed, would not have procured, in so nice and critical a conjuncture, a Charge of foot for a known Coward. But there was more it seems in the case: We now find from this report, to which Lord Bardolph had given full credit, that the world had its eye upon Falstaff as an officer of merit, whom it expected to find in the field, and whose fate in the battle was an object of Public concern: His life was, it seems, very material indeed; a thread of so much dependence, that fiction, weaving the fates of Princes, did not think it unworthy, how coarse soever, of being made a part of the tissue.

We shall next produce the evidence of the Chief Justice of England. He inquires of his attendant, “if "the man who was then passing him was Falstaff; he who "was in question for the robbery." The attendant answers affirmatively, but reminds his lord "that he had since done "good service at Shrewsbury"; and the Chief Justice, on

[ocr errors]

this occasion, rating him for his debaucheries, tells him "that his day's service at Shrewsbury had gilded over his night's exploit at Gads Hill." This is surely more than Common fame: The Chief Justice must have known his whole character taken together, and must have received the most authentic information, and in the truest colours, of his behaviour in that action.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

But, perhaps, after all, the Military men may be esteemed the best judges in points of this nature. Let us hear then Coleville of the dale, a Soldier, in degree a Knight, a famous rebel, and "whose betters, had they been "ruled by him, would have sold themselves dearer": A man who is of consequence enough to be guarded by Blunt and led to present execution. This man yields himself up even to the very Name and Reputation of Falstaff. I think," says he, "you are Sir John Falstaff, and in that thought yield me." But this is but one only among the men of the sword; and they shall be produced then by dozens, if that will satisfy. Upon the return of the King and Prince Henry from Wales, the Prince seeks out and finds Falstaff debauching in a tavern; where Peto presently brings an account of ill news from the North; and adds, "that as he came along he met or over"took a dozen Captains, bare-headed, sweating, knocking at the taverns, and asking every one for Sir John Falstaff." He is followed by Bardolph, who informs Falstaff that “He must away to the Court immediately; a dozen Captains stay at "door for him." Here is Military evidence in abundance, and Court evidence too; for what are we to infer from Falstaff's being sent for to Court on this ill news, but that his opinion was to be asked, as a Military man of skill and experience, concerning the defences necessary to be taken. Nor is Shakespeare content, here, with leaving us to gather up Falstaff's better character from inference and deduction: He comments on the fact by making Falstaff observe that "Men of merit are sought after: The undeserver may sleep "when the man of action is called on." I do not wish to draw Falstaff's character out of his own mouth; but

[ocr errors]

this observation refers to the fact, and is founded in reason. Nor ought we to reject what in another place he says to the Chief Justice, as it is in the nature of an appeal to his knowledge. "There is not a dangerous "action," says he, "can peep out his head but I am thrust upon it." The Chief Justice seems by his answer to admit the fact. "Well, be honest, be honest, and heaven "bless your expedition." But the whole passage may deserve transcribing.

[ocr errors]

Ch. Just. "Well, the King has served you and Prince Henry. I hear you are going with Lord John of Lancaster against the Archbishop and the Earl of Northumberland."

"Fals. Yes, I thank your pretty sweet wit for it; but "look you pray, all you that kiss my lady peace at home, "that our armies join not in a hot day; for I take but two "shirts out with me, and I mean not to sweat extraordinarily: If it be a hot day, if I brandish any thing but a bottle, "would I might never spit white again. There is not a dangerous action can peep out his head but I am thrust upon it. Well I cannot last for ever.-But it was always "the trick of our English nation, if they have a good thing << to make it too common. If you will needs say I am an “old man you should give me rest: I would to God my name were not so terrible to the enemy as it is. "to be eaten to death with a rust than to nothing with perpetual motion."

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

I were better

be scour'd to

"Ch. Just. Well be honest, be honest, and heaven bless "your expedition."

Falstaff indulges himself here in humourous exaggeration; these passages are not meant to be taken, nor are we to suppose that they were taken, literally ;—but if there was not a ground of truth, if Falstaff had not had such a degree of Military reputation as was capable of being thus humourously amplified and exaggerated, the whole dialogue would have been highly preposterous and absurd, and the acquiescing answer of the Lord Chief Justice singularly improper.-But upon the supposition of Falstaff's being considered, upon the whole, as a good and

« AnteriorContinuar »