Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

the doctrine of fate. And that the difference betwixt them and the fata-
lists, is not material. III. That the same reasons, which induced the
philosophers, from the light of reason, to condemn this fate in those
heathens who maintained it, induced the christians to reject it when it
was taught by the Colobarsians, Priscillianists, and other heretics.

I. We own, (1.) That they who are preserved from falling, are so
preserved by the power of God through faith; but know of no promise
that all true believers shall be so preserved. (2.) That God hath engaged
to preserve them who do not wickedly depart from him, from being forced
from him by the malice, subtilty, and power of their adversaries; but

not from falling from their own steadfastness. (3.) That he hath
promised perseverance to all that use the means; but not that all
shall do so who were once true believers. II. What our adversa-

ries grant, destroys most of their arguments.

CHAP II.

[ocr errors]

I. The arguments against the doctrine of perseverance of all true

believers to the end are taken, (1.) from God's express declaration

to the contrary. Ez. xviii. 24, 26. xxxiii. 13. II. From these words,

Heb. vi. 4, 5, 6. It is impossible, and yet fall away, to renew

them to repentance." III. From these words, Heb. x. 26, 29.

To him that accounteth the blood of the covenant, wherewith he

was sanctified, an unholy thing, there remaineth no more sacrifice

for sin. IV. From those, (ver. 38.) If the just man who lives

by faith, draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him?

V. From those, If after they have escaped the pollutions which

are in the world through lust, they are again entangled and over-

come.' 2 Pet. ii. 18. VI. From many instances of such men who

have actually fallen away, especially in the Jewish nation. This

argument is confirmed from many places of the epistle to the He-

brews. VII. From the commands and exhortations directed to

true believers to continue to the end, and to fear lest they should

fall away; and the cautions, to prevent their doing so; the pro-

mises made to them, if they continue steadfast; the threats against

them who did not so;-of which in general. VIII. In particu-

lar, this is proved, (i.) From the commands. IX. (ii.) The ex-

hortations to persevere. X. (iii.) And to fear lest they should fall

away. XI. (iv.) Particularly from the fears of the apostles lest

it should be so; and (v.) the cautions directed to christians. XII.

(vi.) The promises made to them that do not. XIII. (vii.) The

threats against them that do thus fall away. XIV. (Lastly,) This

is proved from many places, which suppose that true believers may

thus fall.

[ocr errors][merged small]

I. In this chapter is contained an answer to the arguments pro-
duced from scripture to prove the perseverance of saints to the end,
as v. g. (1.) From Mat. xxiv, 24. They shall deceive, if it were

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

I. A comparison betwixt the two doctrines (1.) as to the comfort
of believers; where it is proved, (i.) from many instances, that a
doctrine is not therefore true because it is comfortable to them that
believe it. (i.) That a possibility of falling into a great evil is no
just cause of trouble or anxiety, when I am assured I cannot do
so unless I will and chuse to do so, and cannot do so but by acting
against the clearest rules of reason and discretion, and the highest
motives to the contrary. (iii.) That the doctrine of the saint's per-

severance cannot be truly comfortable, or give any advantage above
the other in the point of comfort. 11. As to their tendency to
promote holiness, where it is shewed that our doctrine hath the ad-
vantage on several accounts. III. That it hath the suffrage of
all the ancients, and was the doctrine of the whole church of
Christ for many ages.

I. THIS chapter contains a reply to two grand objections, against

what hath been discoursed on the foregoing heads, viz. OBJECTION

FIRST. That most of the objections made against the decrees of

God and the unfrustrable influx of God on man, and the deter-

mination of his will to good or evil, are as strong against the pre-

science of God. To this objection it is said, (i.) That this argu-

ment from prescience overthrows these decrees, or renders them

superfluous. 11. (ii.) That the Hobbists and the Fatalists did,

and may, take sanctuary in the divine prescience, as well as the

Decretalists. (i.) That God's prescience hath no influence at all

upon our actions, whereas God's decree of election is powerful and

active, and comprehends the preparation and exhibition of such

means as shall infallibly produce the end. (iv.) That God's pre-

science renders no actions necessary, whereas these decrees must do

so. (v.) That God's prescience respects, not only things future, but

things possible; what may be done by them who will not do it, and

may be left undone by them who do not so. He foresees also after

what manner they will be performed, that free actions will be done

freely, that is, when we might abstain from doing them,—and

omitted freely, that is, when we might perform them. (vi.) That

this argument only proposeth a great difficulty arising from a mode

of knowledge in God, of which we have no idea, against the plain

declarations of his revealed will, and is answered by the distinc-

tion between God's incommunicable and his communicable attri-

« AnteriorContinuar »