« AnteriorContinuar »
beauty and vigor, and became a poor, dull, decaying, dying thing. And besides all this, Adam was that day undone in a more dreadful sense: He immediately fell under the curse of the law, and condemnation to eternal perdition. In the Janguage of scripture, he is dead, that is, in a state of condem. nation to death ; even as our author often explains this language in his exposition upon Romans. In scripture language, he that belieres in Christ, immediately receives life. He passes at that time from death to life, and thenceforward (to use the Apostle John's phrase) “ has eternal life abiding in him." But yet he does not then receive eternal life in its highest completion; he has but the beginning of it, and receives it in a vastly greater degree at death ; but the proper time for the complete fulness is not till the day of judgment. When the angels sinned, their punishment was immediately executed in a degree ; but their full punishment is not until the end of the world. And there is nothing in God's threatening to Adam that bound him to execute his full punishment at once, nor any thing which determines that he should have no posterity. The law or constitution which God established and declared, determined that if he sinned, and had posterity, he and they should die ; but there was no constitution determining concerning the actual being of his posterity in this case ; what posterity he should have, how many, or whether any at all. All these things God had reserved in his own power : The law and its sanction intermeddled not with the matter. i It may be proper in this place also to take some notice of that objection of Dr. Taylor's, against Adam's being supposed to be a federal head for his posterity, that it gives him greater honor than Christ, as it supposes that all his posterity would have had eternal life by his obedience, if he had stood; and so a greater number would have had the benefit of his obedience, than are saved by Christ.* I think a yery little consideration is sufficient to shew that there is no
weight in this objection ; for the benefit of Christ's merils may nevertheless be vastly beyond that which would have been by the obedience of Adam. For those that are saved by Christ, are not merely advanced to happiness by his merits, but are saved from the infinitely dreadful effects of Adam's sin, and many from immense guilt, pollution and misery, by personal sins ; also brought to a holy and happy state, as it were through infinite obstacles, and are exalted to a far greater degree of dignity, felicity and glory, than would have been due for Adam's obedience, for aught I know, many thousand times so great. And there is enough in the gospel dispensa. tion, clearly to manifest the sufficiency of Christ's merits for such effects in all mankind. And how great the number will be, that shall actually be the subjects of them, or how great a proportion of the whole race, considering the vast success of the gospel, that shall be in that future, extraordinary and glorious season, often spoken of, none can tell. And the hon. or of these two federal heads arises not so much from what was proposed to each for his trial, as from their success, and the good actually obtained, and also the manner of obtaining. Christ obtains the benefits men have through him by proper merit of condignity, and a true purchase by an equivalent ; which would not have been the case with Adąm, if he had obeyed.
I have now particularly considered the account which Moses gives us in the beginning of the Bible, of our first parents, and God's dealings with them, the constitution he established with them, their transgression, and what followed. And on the whole, if we consider the manner in which God apparentJy speaks to Adam from time to time ; and particularly, if we consider how plainly and undeniably his posterity are included in the sentence of death pronounced on Adam after his fall, founded on the foregoing threatening; and consider the curse denounced on the ground for his sake, and for his and his posterity's sorrow : And also consider what is eviden:ly the occa
sion of his giving his wife the new name of Eve, and his mean· ing in it, and withal consider apparent fact in constant and
universal events, with relation to the state of our first parente,
and their posterity from that time forward, through all ages of the world ; I cannot but think, it must appear to every impartial person, that Moses' account does, with sufficient evi. dence, lead all mankind, to whom his account is communicated, to understand, that God, in his constitution with Adam, dealt with him as a public person, and as the head of the human species, and had respect to his posterity, as included in him : And that this history is given by divine direction, in the beginning of the first written revelation, to exhibit to our view the origin of the present, sinful, miserable state of mankind, that we might see what that was, which first gave occasion for all those consequent, wonderful dispensations of divine mercy and grace towards mankind, which are the great subject of the scriptures, both of the Old and New Testament: And that these things are not obscurely and doubtfully pointed forth, but delivered in a plain account of things, which easily and naturally exhibits them to our understandings.
And by, what follows in this discourse, we may have, in some measure, opportunity to see how other things in the Holy Scripture agree with what has been now observed from the three first chapters of Genesis.
Observations on other parts of the Holy Scriptures,
chiefly in the Old Testament, that prove the · doctrine of ORIGINAL SIN.
ORIGINAL depravity may well be argued, from wickedness being often spoken of in scripture, as a thing belonging to the race of mankind, and as if it were a property of the species. So in Psal. xiv. 2, 3. « The Lord looked down from
heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God. They are all gone aside ; they are together become filthy: There is none that doeth good ; no, not one.” The like we have again, Psal. liii. 2, 3. Dr. Taylor says, p. 104, 105. “ The Holy Spirit does not mean this of every individual ; because in the very same psalm, he speaks of some that were righteous, ver. 5, God iş in the generation of the righteous." But how little is this observation to the purpose? For who ever supposed, that no unrighteous men were ever changed by divine grace, and afterwards made righteous ? The Psalmist is speaking of what men are as they are the children of men, born of the corrupt human race ; and not as born of God, whereby thoy come to be the children of God, and of the generation of the righteous. The Apostle Paul cites this place in Rom. iii. 10, 11, 12, to prove the universal corruption of mankind ; but yet in the same chapter he supposes these same persons here spoken of as wicked, may become righteous, through the righteous. ness and grace of God.
So wickedness is spoken of in other places in the Book of Psalms, as a thing that belongs to men, as of the human race, as sons of men. Thus in Psal. iv. 2. « Oye sons of men, how long will ye turn my glory into shame? How long will ye love vanity ?” &c. Psal. lvii. 4. “ I lie among them that are set on fire, even the sons of men, whose teeth are spears and are rows, and their tongue a sharp sword.” Psal. Iviii. 1, 2. “ Do ye indeed speak righteousness, O congregation? Do ye judge uprightly, O ye sons of men ? Yea, in heart ye work wickedness ; ye weigh out the violence of your hands in the earth." Our author, mentioning these places, says p. 105, Note, “ There was a strong party in Israel disaffected to David's person and government, and sometimes he chooseth to denote them by the sons or children of men." But it would have been worth his while to have inquired, Why the Psalmist should choose to denote the wickedest and worst men in Israel by this name? Why he should choose thus to disgrace the human race, as if the compellation of sons of men most properly belonged to such as were of the vilest characters
and as if all the sons of men, even every one of them, were of such a character, and none of them did good ; no, not one? Is it not strange, that the righteous should not be thought worthy to be called sons of men, and ranked with that noble race of beings, who are born into the world wholly right and innocent! It is a' good, easy, and natural reason, why he chooseth to call the wicked, son8 of men, as a proper name for them, that by being of the sons of men, or of the corrupt, ruined race of mankind, they come by their depravity. And the Psalmist himself leads us to this very reason, Psal. Iviii, at the beginning. «Do ye judge uprightly, O'ye sons of men ? Yea, in heart yé work wickedness, ye weigh out the violence of your hands. The wicked are estranged from the womb," &c. of which I shall speak mote by and by.
Agreeable to these places is Prov. xxi. 8. “ The way of man is froward and strange ; but as for the pure, his work is right." He that is perverse in his walk; is here called by the name of man, as distinguished from the pure : Which I think is absolutely unaccountable, if all mankind by nature are pure, and perfectly innocent, and all such as are froward and strange in their ways, therein depart from the native purity of all mankind. The words naturally lead us to suppose the contrary ; that depravity and perverseness properly belong to mankind as they are naturally, and that a being made pure, is by an afterwork, by which some are delivered from native pollution, and distinguished from mankind in general ; which is perfectly agreeable to the representation in Rev. xiv. 4, where we have an account of a number that were not defiled, but were pure, and followed the Lamb; of whom it is said, These were redeemed from among men.
To these things agree Jer. xvii. 5, 9. In ver. 5, it is said, « Cursed is he that trusteth in man." And in ver. 9, this reason is given, « The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked ; who can know it ?” What heart is this so wicked and deceitful ? Why, evidently the heart of him, whom, it was said before, we must not trust; and that is man. It alters not the case, as to the present argument, whether the deceitfulness of the heart here spoken of, be its deceitfulness