## Linear Operators: Spectral theory |

### From inside the book

Results 1-3 of 79

Page 1085

R. - 1 n - 1 48 ( Fredholm Determinant Series ) Let the hypotheses of the

R. - 1 n - 1 48 ( Fredholm Determinant Series ) Let the hypotheses of the

**preceding**exercise be satisfied , and suppose that the Hilbert space of that exercise is L ( S , E , y ) , where ( S , E , u ) is a positive measure space .Page 1419

By the

By the

**preceding**lemma , -f ( t ) < fi ( t ) in [ si + 1 , mi + 1 ] . ... To prove the corollary it suffices to make the change of variablet → -t in the**preceding**corollary . Q.E.D. PROOF OF THEOREM 24. If the function q of Theorem 24 ...Page 1425

It follows from the

It follows from the

**preceding**lemma that there exists a constant k such that for all t in { a , o ) , [ * ] k max \ | ( s ) 2 max l / ' ( s ) l . اک 8 که اکو که Indeed , if this were not the case , then to every integer m we could ...### What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

### Contents

BAlgebras | 859 |

Miscellaneous Applications | 937 |

Compact Groups | 945 |

Copyright | |

44 other sections not shown

### Common terms and phrases

additive adjoint operator algebra Amer analytic assume Banach spaces basis belongs Borel boundary conditions boundary values bounded called clear closed closure coefficients compact complex Consequently constant contains continuous converges Corollary corresponding defined Definition denote dense determined domain eigenvalues element equal equation essential spectrum evident Exercise exists extension finite follows formal differential operator formula function function f given Hence Hilbert space identity independent indices inequality integral interval Lemma limit linear mapping Math matrix measure multiplicity neighborhood norm obtained partial positive preceding present problem projection proof properties prove range regular remark representation respectively restriction result satisfies seen sequence singular solution spectral square-integrable statement subset subspace sufficiently Suppose symmetric Theorem theory topology transform unique vanishes vector zero