Thy mother felt more than a mother's pain, yet brought forth less than a mother's hope; To wit, an indigest deformed lump, Not like the fruit of such a goodly tree. Teeth hadst thou in thy head, when thou wast born, To signify, thou cam'st to bite the world: And, if the rest be true which I have heard, 'Thou cam'st Glo. I'll hear no more;-Die, prophet, in thy speech; [Stabs him. For this, amongst the rest, was I ordain'd. K. Hen. Ay, and for much more slaughter after this. O God! forgive my sins, and pardon thee! [Dies.' Glo. What, will the aspiring blood of Lancaster Sink in the ground? I thought it would have mounted. See, how my sword weeps for the poor king's death! 'O, may such purple tears be always shed From those that wish the downfal of our house! Down, down to hell; and say—I sent thee thither. Also on the turrets the skrich howle, &c. And in Golding's translation of Ovid's Metam. book vi.:- 6 A cursed owle, the messenger of ill successe and lucke.' rudis indigestaque moles.' Ovid. Met. i. 7. O, Jesus bless us, he is born with teeth! That I should snarl, and bite, and play the dog. And this word-love, which greybeards call divine, Be resident in men like one another, And not in me; I am myself alone.— And triumph, Henry, in thy day of doom. [Exit. SCENE VII. The same. A Room in the Palace. KING EDWARD is discovered sitting on his Throne ; QUEEN ELIZABETH with the infant Prince, CLARENCE, GLOSTER, HASTINGS, and Others, near him. K. Edw. Once more we sit in England's royal throne, Repurchas'd with the blood of enemies. What valiant foemen, like to autumn's corn, 7 Dryden seems to have had this line in his mind when writing his Edipus: 'It was thy crooked mind hunch'd out thy back, And wander'd in thy limbs.' • Select, choose out. Have we mow'd down1, in tops of all their pride? Three dukes of Somerset, threefold renown'd For hardy and undoubted champions : Two Cliffords, as the father and the son, That in their chains fetter'd the kingly lion, Come hither, Bess, and let me kiss my boy:- Glo. I'll blast his harvest, if your head were laid; [Aside. K. Edw. Clarence, and Gloster, love my lovely queen; And kiss your princely nephew, brothers both. Clar. The duty, that I owe unto your majesty, I seal upon the lips of this sweet babe. K. Edw. Thanks, noble Clarence; worthy brother, thanks 3. 1 A kindred image occurs in King Henry V.:— mowing like grass Your fresh-fair virgins, and your flow'ring infants.' 2 Gloucester may be supposed to touch his head and look significantly at his hand. 3 The old quarto play appropriates this line to the queen. The 'Glo. And, that I love the tree from whence thou sprang'st, 'Witness the loving kiss I give the fruit: To all harm. Aside. K. Edw. Now am I seated as my soul delights, Having my country's peace, and brothers' loves. Clar. What will your grace have done with Margaret? Reignier, her father, to the king of France And now what rests, but that we spend the time THE three parts of King Henry VI. are suspected, by Mr. Theobald, of being supposititious, and are declared, by Dr. Warburton, to be certainly not Shakspeare's. Mr. Theobald's suspicion arises from some obsolete words; but the phraseology is like the rest of our author's style; and single words, of which, however, I do not observe more than two, can conclude little. Dr. Warburton gives no reason; but I suppose him to judge upon deeper principles and more comprehensive views, and to draw his opinion from the general effect and spirit of the composition, which he thinks inferior to the other historical plays. : From mere inferiority nothing can be inferred in the productions of wit there will be inequality. Sometimes judgment will err, and sometimes the matter itself will defeat the artist. Of every author's works, one will be the best, and one will be the worst. The colours are not equally pleasing, nor the attitudes equally graceful, in all the pictures of Titian or Reynolds. Dissimilitude of style and heterogeneousness of sentiment, may sufficiently show that a work does not really belong to the reputed author. But in these plays no such marks of spuriousness are found. The diction, the versification, and the figures, are Shakspeare's. These plays, considered, without regard to characters and incidents, merely as narratives in verse, are more happily conceived, and more accurately finished than those of King John, King Richard II. or the tragick scenes of King Henry IV. and V. If we take these plays from Shakspeare, to whom shall they be given? What author of that age had the same easiness of expression and fluency of numbers* ? Of these three plays I think the second the best. The truth is, that they have not sufficient variety of action, for the incidents are too often of the same kind; yet many of the characters are well discriminated. King Henry, and his Queen, King Edward, the Duke of Gloucester, and the Earl of Warwick, are very strongly and distinctly painted. The old copies of the two latter parts of King Henry VI. and of King Henry V. are so apparently mutilated and imperfect, that there is no reason for supposing them the first draughts of Shakspeare. I am inclined to believe them copies taken by some auditor, who wrote down during the representation what the time would permit; then, perhaps, filled up some of his omissions at a second or third hearing, and, when he had by this method formed something like a play, sent it to the printer. JOHNSON. *This note by Dr. Johnson has been preserved notwithstanding the full answer to his argument which is given in the abstract of Malone's dissertation prefixed to these plays, which discriminates between what is and what is not from the hand of our great poet. 'No fraudulent copyist (says Malone) or shorthand writer would have invented circumstances totally different from those which appear in Shakspeare's new modelled draughts, as exhibited in the folio, or insert whole speeches of which scarcely a trace is to be found in that edition.' END OF VOL. VI. C. and C. Whittingham, College House, Chiswick. |